Sexual Rights…for Your Children?

 

child sex trade

The Sexual Rights Cartels around the world have produced generations of so-called experts, educators, and elected-officials who believe that everyone has the right to sex with whoever they “need” to, regardless of age.

There are no boundaries for sexual exploitation.

The United Nations redefined “prostitution” to make the “profession” more respectable while ignoring how these women, and men, were forced into it.

At the UN, the politically correct phrases are: “trafficking,” “sex slavery,” “sex work,” and “sex workers.” This is Orwellian doublespeak…”

Employing the word “sex work” represents a prevailing point of view in which women are seen as having “agency,” and therefore can freely choose to be sex workers. The phrase “sex work” is an attempt to mainstream prostitution as just another form of work. Doing so utterly obliterates the fact that prostitutes are most often unwilling victims who suffer from a much higher rate of post-traumatic stress symptomatology than do combat veterans. It hides the fact that American Johns often want—and get—young children or certainly under-age children. Legally, a good deal of prostitution is pedophilia or legalized rape.

Read more here…

Parents, your children are not safe! You cannot trust your schools, churches, elected officials, Health Departments, Social Service Agencies, or anyone else to protect your children. They have ALL failed. You are the only adults in your child’s life that will care enough to set boundaries and educate them on how to completely avoid the risky behaviors facing them.

Even if you failed to form a healthy family, you must now think about your child’s future. What will their family look like?

Find out how to teach your children about Healthy Family Formation, which includes the proven benefits of marriage and raising the next generation to be economically self-sufficient and emotionally healthy.

When parents finally wake up to the fact that sex is not just entertainment, but has biological and neurological implications for every individual and future generations, it may be too late.

Absolute social and economic chaos will be the norm, globally.

Resources:

 

 

“It’s Hard to Stop Ebola?” “Reduce the Risks?”

CDC Ebola 1Are you one of many questioning the CDC’s responses to Ebola? Why does the CDC talk about containment, yet refuse to contain Ebola at its source?

Maybe now you can begin to understand why skeptics at  ExposeSexEdNow! have been baffled by the CDC’s “prevention” methods, especially when it pertains to human behaviors or politically correct protocols.

The CDC does not have a track record for responding adequately to past or current epidemics such as HIV, Gonorrhea, Syphilis, Chlamydia, HPV, nor even the so-called “crises” of pregnancies or population growth.

After 9 months, the US gets hit with Ebola and it now matters?! The CDC and others have had 9 months to plan their responses and it is suspected that they will not let a “crisis go to waste.”

When Tom Frieden, CDC Director said that “It’s hard to stop Ebola” and the CDC is “reducing the risks” of Ebola transmissions it was clear that that they are operating in their default ideological mode.

Not only is the Ebola outbreak revealing CDC’s ideology, it is exposing this same ideology used by their colleagues at US HHS, Planned Parenthood and SIECUS, who are pushing their National Sexuality Standards globally.

“Reducing the Risks” is their MO. This mantra is all over the CDC’s website and has been played out for decades in various scenarios involving the control of human behaviors.

The CDC labels certain risks “acceptable,” especially if they are too politically charged or “hard to stop.”  They ‘throw up their hands,’ proclaim that some risks are “too hard to stop,” and issue superficial instructions to prevent the transmission of the problem.

Concerning screenings for Ebola, checking for fevers at airports, asking if the person has been to West Africa, and “washing your hands” are simply not enough. Do they not know that people will take Tylenol, lie, and not wash their hands?

The CDC continues to prevent STDs and pregnancies through “risk reduction” rather than a “risk avoidance” strategy, as they have since the 80’s. Typical ‘sexual foreplay’ education in US schools includes politically correct, feel good, and after-the-fact prevention methods such as condoms and dental dams, “safe sex,” hormonal birth control, Plan B, abortion, and telling the public that sexual behaviors, especially among teens, are just “too hard to stop.”

Factor in a very powerful and heavily funded Sexual Rights Agenda, that will not allow certain sexual behaviors to be stopped or discouraged, and epidemics happen.

Telling the truth about certain behaviors and mandating strategies to AVOID behaviors that cause the negative consequences is not often part of the CDC’s or the WHO’s public health model.

Nor, does it keep the funding flowing in their direction!

Contrary to the Hollywood narratives, the CDC does not seem to want or know how to adequately quarantine the infected and/or stop the problems at the source.

Maybe that is what our 4,000 military personnel sent to West Africa are supposed to do before they get sick?

PP-Network Takes Credit for Teen Abstinence??

1 in 4 girls has ever had sexWhile the Planned Parenthood Network (PP-Network) pumps out endless propaganda bashing abstinence-until-marriage education and takes credit for the dramatic decreases in teen pregnancies, CDC data shows that teens (15-17) have been abstaining from sex, at increasing rates, over the past decade. The most recent data shows that almost 75% of teens (15-17) nationally surveyed by the CDC, have not had sex.

To the PP-Network, the only problem with sex is that it makes babies and BABIES ARE A REAL PROBLEM for them. Sexual Rights is the PP-Network’s agenda. Therefore, whatever it takes to prevent babies from being conceived, developing or born is the goal of the sex and abortion industry.

Why is the PP-Network so OFFENDED by abstinence-until-marriage education?

Because, abstinence-until-marriage education promotes MARRIAGE and FIDELITY WITHIN MARRIAGE.

The PP-Network has no problem saying that they believe in abstinence, as long as they get to define what abstinence means. To them, oral sex, anal sex, and mutual masturbation are the same as abstinence, because these sex acts do not make babies.

And, these SexPerts have no problem telling kids to abstain, as long as there are no restrictions on how long they must wait. Abstinence to them can be until teens are 13, 16, 18 or whenever they feel they are ready to be “proud and responsible” enough to use condoms and take toxic hormones.

This is why Comprehensive Sex Education is such a farce. It is not, and cannot be, “comprehensive” since it would have to teach all views on the purposes of sex.

The PP view of sex ed is to promote hedonism without forming a family while Abstinence-Until-Marriage Education promotes romance and healthy family formation, within marriage, resulting in connected generations of families.

There is no comprehensive program or curriculum that could attempt to teach both views, with a straight face. It would be ludicrous! Which view do you think will provide the best future for your child?

Proponents of Comprehensive Sex Education claim that it covers abstinence and contraception and everything in between. Except that it doesn’t. What they hide from the public, and especially parents, is the fact that they do not teach about marriage, family formation, or the responsibilities of raising children. They teach sex.

Proponents also do not want it exposed that add-on programs, like Making A Difference! and Making Proud Choices!, both listed on PP’s website, teach sexual foreplay and intercourse, under the guise of STD prevention, so that condoms can be taught to younger and younger kids. However, sexual foreplay also spreads STDs. Medically Accurate?

Abstinence-Until-Marriage education is the exact opposite of the PP-Network’s Sexual Rights Agenda in the following ways:

Abstinence-Until-Marriage programs are holistic, meaning that humans are viewed as whole beings with value and uniqueness. The act of sex biologically impacts the mind, body, emotions and spirit as humans engage in it, even if there is no intercourse. This is why humans are different. We are not animals.

  • The PP-Network’s Sexual Rights Agenda views humans as genitals to be fondled, and maybe if convenient, protected from disease with condoms. Little girls and women are to use hormones to prevent or get rid of pregnancies. In the end, humans are simply sex toys for someone else’s pleasure. This is why the PP-Networks want no limits or restrictions on sex.  

Abstinence-Until-Marriage programs teach students that abstinence means not engaging in sexual activity until marriage, including vaginal, oral, anal sex and mutual masturbation. Such programs also teach about the dangers of porn, sexting, and cohabitation.

  • The PP-Network’s Sexual Rights Agenda promotes unbridled sexual activity – at any age – with anyone or anything – as long as there is “consent” – whatever that means.

Abstinence-Until-Marriage promotes life-long, faithful marriage. The social sciences have proven that there are at least Thirty Benefits of Marriage and that children fare best on all social indicators when raised by their own two married parents.

  • The PP-Network’s Sexual Rights Agenda seeks to destroy marriage as an institution and therefore the traditional family. Even the gay marriage movement is just a Progressive ploy to gradually redefine the family and get rid of marriage as an institution and a societal good. None of the sex programs for schools listed on the PP website promote marriage, even for gay couples.

Abstinence-Until-Marriage promotes the fact that sex is wonderful and creates intimacy – within the context of marriage. When sex takes place within a marriage, it is more likely to be safer than outside of marriage. Research has shown that married couples have more sex and more satisfying sex than singles.

  • The PP-Network’s Sexual Rights agenda promotes sex without boundaries, especially without the restraints of marriage, monogamy, or commitment. They portray an unrealistic, unsatisfying, and false view of “Hollywood” sex to get people of all ages hooked on sexual pleasures.    

Abstinence-Until-Marriage promotes the fact that waiting until one has finished their education, and married before having sex and children is the best way to become an economically self-sufficient and prosperous member of society with a stable family life.

  • The PP-Network’s Sexual Rights agenda teaches that humans are sexual from birth and need to have sex in order to mature properly. (Alfred Kinsey/SIECUS) They target poor, minority, inner city neighborhoods to push their sex without boundaries, contraception and abortion agenda. This increases the risks of generational poverty, drop-out rates, and unwed childbearing. 
  • Planned Parenthood receives millions of taxpayer dollars annually to promote their agenda, plus they are large part of Obamacare so the revolving door of poverty and dependency will continue to spin out of control.

So, why are teen pregnancy rates declining? For many reasons.

According to several CDC reports, more and more teens are choosing to delay sex and those who are having sex are being more selective. The PP Network cannot take credit for the increase in abstinence, because they do not seriously teach it.

Real credit needs to go to the smart teens themselves who are choosing to abstain. Also, to parents, faith leaders and educators who really care about kids and are not afraid to tell them to delay sex until marriage.

Let’s not give credit to those who are promoting a Sexual Rights Agenda and are being paid by the sex industries.

That would be a farce.

Final Throes of Transformation?

Obama and PPIn order to get public buy-in for genocide, there had to be mass indoctrination beginning at a very young age. Generations of children had to be Progressively trained to accept the slaughter of the unborn by neutralizing this “product of conception” and viewing its destruction as a good, charitable, and even merciful act.

Once trained to pay for this destruction (taxes/Obamacare) we were hooked.

And so, Planned Parenthood Sex Education was designed and implemented in our public schools, and in many churches, to systematically brainwash generations into separating all sexual activity from the realm of intimacy and procreation to simply another form of entertainment and enlightenment, much like Netflix and Facebook.

Separating the act of sex from life-long commitment, conception, children, parenting, marriage, and family is the means by which the destruction of marriage, family and society and the takeover of whole populations is achieved.

We are in the final throes of this Progressive transformation of America.

Read more: Planned Parenthood: Culture of  Genocide 

Time to “Opt Out” of Sex Class?

Stop_SignMost sex ed in public schools has nothing to do with promoting  health. It does not promote abstinence from sex and it does not protect teens from STDs. Sex ed goes far beyond teaching the methods of contraception. In many cases, it is all about grooming immature students into a sexualized life-style, while their brains are developing.

When school starts, there will be a stack of forms and consents for parents to sign. There may be a passive consent form asking your permission to teach your child sex ed, without specifying the name of the program, content or intent. If you do not sign it, your child will be sent to sex class. Only if you tell them to “Opt Out” your child, will they be spared.

Parents (and taxpayers) need to call their school districts  and ask to view the entire contents of all sex education curricula being used. Make sure they give you the teacher’s manual, student workbooks, handouts, DVDs and posters.

Obviously, this will take time so you need to plan several hours, or do it as a team with each adult viewing different pieces of the curricula. Take notes. Write down page numbers and quotes from the pages. When you see something disturbing, get a partner to witness it and write it down, verbatim.

It is important for you to document what you see from the actual curricula, otherwise you will be accused of making it up.

One only has to see these programs and lessons for themselves, to understand that they are all about promoting sex, sexual rights, and increasing the profit margins of the sex and abortion industries.

The public schools are failing to teach our kids how to read, write, or understand math, science and history. Teachers often complain that they cannot teach students after they have had sex class. No wonder!

Students are being groomed for sex and dumbed down into sexual machines that cannot think for themselves. What better way to control the masses?

The following quotes are from Making Proud Choices! and should be a wake-up call for any reasonable parent or taxpayer. Making Proud Choices! teaches 11-13 year old middle school student how to make sex with condoms fun and pleasurable. It calls itself a “Safer-Sex Approach,” but the sexual foreplay they suggest would spread bodily fluids and STDs such as Syphilis, Herpes and HPV, which are transmitted skin to skin.

Making Proud Choices! does not teach reproduction, abstinence, or the benefits of marriage. It is all about promoting sex under the guise of condoms and STD prevention.

The following lesson is all about normalizing sex with and among minor children and encouraging tolerance towards those who want to have sex. Notice that the idea of “protected sex” is paramount. Abstinence is totally missing from this lesson.

Making Proud Choices!: Attitude statements about condom and contraception use for 6th Grade/Middle School (pg. 70)

1. Attitude: “It would be embarrassing to go to the drug store to get birth control.”

Answer: “(Even though it may be embarrassing, you have to work through it because a pregnancy can be more embarrassing.)”

 2. Attitude: “Using condoms would kill the mood and ruin sexual pleasure.”

Answer: “(Condoms can be fun and pleasurable if you know the skills to make them that way.)”

3. Attitude: “Girls who carry condoms are easy/slutty.”

Answer: “(Girls who carry condoms are smart, responsible, proud and safe.)”

4. Attitude: “Refusing to have sex if my partner will not use a condom is hard to do.”

Answer: “(Refusing unsafe sex is the proud responsible thing to do.)”

5.  Attitude: “It would be easy to discuss contraceptive methods and condom use with my boyfriend or girlfriend.

Answer: “(It is easy when your mind is made up and you know why you want to be safe.)”

Making Proud Choices!: “HOW TO MAKE CONDOMS FUN AND PLEASURABLE” 6th Grade & Middle School Activity B Procedure for Teachers (p.150)

Rational: “Helping participants see how they can make condom use fun and pleasurable for themselves and their partners encourages consistent use and a sense of pride and responsibility.”

Teachers are told to “Add the following ideas to the list if they [students] were not already mentioned by the participants.”

  • “Sex is more fun when condoms are used because…
  • You can use condoms as a method of foreplay.
  • You can think up sexual fantasy using condoms.
  • You can act sexy/sensual when putting condoms on.
  • You can hide one on your body and ask your partner to find it.
  • You can tease each other sexually while putting on the condom.
  • You can have fun putting one on our partner while pretending you are different people or in different situations.
  • You feel more relaxed and can really enjoy yourself.
  • Condoms make erections last longer.

Following are more Making Proud Choices! pages in the teacher manual:

Pg. 38-40 Teachers “norm” the classroom and get kids to agree not to talk about what happens in class when they leave.

Pg. 60  Abstinence is the same as safer sex.

Pg. 62 Pros about contraception, but no cons listed.

Pg. 66 Even for students who practice abstinence, they are told to use birth control as a back up.

Pg. 70, 85, 91 Instructions about fun, pleasurable sexual foreplay with condoms. This is beyond teaching “about” contraception and outside most state laws governing sex ed.

Pg. 73 Poster of STDs. HPV is missing.  Medically Inaccurate Info

Pg. 74, 8 & 10 Students are told that “anyone can get STDs.” Students who abstain will not get STDs.  Medically Inaccurate Info

Pg. 75 Condoms protect from STDs. Medically Inaccurate Info

Pg. 76-92  Condom skills classes to break down natural defenses about sex and condoms. Teaches about “kiddie condoms” for little penises.

Pg. 91 Students are warned not to drink alcohol or take drugs, but taught sexual foreplay.

Pg. 108 Green, Yellow and Red Light Behaviors. Some of the Green and Yellow light behaviors, which many teens will think they can handle, include: 

  • Having sex with a person who is having sex with other people
    • Oral sex on a guy with a condom
    • Anal sex with a condom
    • Mutual masturbation
    • Vaginal sex with a condom
    • Oral sex on a girl using a dental dam
    • Having sex with multiple partners and using a condom (group sex and/or serial partners)
    • Having sex with only one person (monogamous) [this normalizes serial monogamy]

This should get any parent or taxpayer started! There are many more pages throughout the curriculum to discover and expose. This means there is no way that schools can just not teach a lesson. It is polluted throughout.

These programs do not include anything that would teach your child to avoid risky behaviors, yet they are being used in schools, where Johnny can’t read, write, do math or understand basic science.

Even if your kids are grown, what about your grandchildren? What about your taxes spent to promote these programs.

What will you do? You are the last, but should be the first, defender of your children. You may still have the power to opt out your child from sex ed. Why not? If just 15 families in each school opted their children out of sex ed it would send a huge message to the school district.

If you feel it would embarrass your child to be outside the sex class, then you may be the one with the problem. Your child will be far more influenced by the content of these type classes than by going to the library or study hall.

You are the last defense for your children. If you don’t Parent Up for them now, no one else will.

Check out: Sex, Lies and Hook Ups: A Parent’s Guide for Fighting Back

Shelby Knox Exposed!

sexed-planned-parenthood-lila-roseReports are coming in about tonight’s Shelby Knox event in Charleston, South Carolina. We are not surprised.

It was NOT a full house by any means, but swarming with folks from the Planned Parenthood Network. One woman gushed,

“You won’t find more Progressives any place else!”

The event was orchestrated by the League of Women Voters to influence the Charleston County School Board elections in the fall. There are 5 open seats for the November elections.

One reporter asked Shelby Knox, “Do you think it’s loving to confirm someone in behavior that may be harmful to them?” Shelby paused and stumbled around and didn’t really answer the question. She was really taken aback!

The Education of Shelby Knox, her award winning documentary, included a lot of footage bashing True Love Waits, a respected faith-based abstinence-until-marriage education program used mostly in Baptist Churches.

If you did not get to read our recent article exposing Shelby Knox, here it is: http://wp.me/p3Jbg1-kX  

Again, Shelby Knox and the Planned Parenthood Network are expected to bash faith-based programs that promote abstinence until marriage and faithfulness within marriage. That’s just who they are.

But, to bash Evidence-based, Science-based abstinence until marriage education that has been proven effective and approved by US Health and Human Services is simply ludicrous.

Beware Planned Parenthood Sex Education in your schools. Consider the source!

Shelby Knox: Exploited by the Sexual Rights Agenda?

Shelby Knox 1

In 2001, Shelby Knox was a 15 year old high school student in Lubbock, Texas. A local charismatic preacher addressed the assembly at her school and preached about the consequences of sex and about how important it was to abstain from sex to prevent pregnancy and STDs.

Knowing that many of the girls in her school were sexually active and pregnant, Shelby was right to feel that her peers needed to know much more than “Just Say No!”

This event and Shelby’s zeal for justice to protect her sexually active peers helped to launch a movement, including her own documentary, which has spread beyond Texas to the nation. She has become a strong advocate for Comprehensive Sex Education and an ardent opponent of Abstinence-Until-Marriage Education.

Most will agree that age appropriate, medically accurate sex education needs to be taught to adolescents and teens, either in school or by their parents. The problem is, who defines these terms? If Comprehensive Sex Education in the schools were truly “age appropriate,” “medically accurate” and “comprehensive,” then we would have no argument with Shelby Knox or anyone else.

However, many so-called “Comprehensive” Sex Education programs are not what they claim to be. Read other blog posts at ExposeSexEdNow.com for information about programs that teach sexual foreplay techniques to adolescents and teens in our public schools.

Shelby was right back in 2001, at least about her own sex ed experience. Most “abstinence-only” sex ed back in 2001 was Mom & Pop, fear and shame-based, “faith-based” sex education, which lacked referenced medically accurate information. Some of these programs are still around today. Until the mid 90’s, many abstinence-only education programs were cobbled together from different sources and presented by well-meaning volunteers with varying degrees of credibility.

That is precisely why in 1996, when President Clinton signed Welfare Reform, that Abstinence Education was strictly defined by Congress (A-H) and all programs were required to comply with rigorous standards in order to qualify for any Title V Abstinence Education funding.

Some of the goals under Welfare Reform were to increase sustainable two parent families and decrease unwed teen pregnancies by promoting Healthy Family Formation. Funding for A-H Abstinence Education was established to change teen sexual behavior by motivating them to delay sex until marriage, become self-sufficient, and then get married before having children.

Not only were the A-H requirements science-based, but all funded programs had to be science-based.  None of the curricula funded could be faith-based. 

In addition, these programs would be required to set aside a specified percent of their funding for independent evaluations that would be conducted over the subsequent decade to determine if they could increase abstinence among vulnerable adolescents and teens and decrease teen pregnancies.

Such federal and state regulation, oversight, and scrutiny has been unprecedented for any funded sex related program in the nation.

So, as much as Shelby Knox, and the Sexual Rights Groups that have apparently radicalized her, want to blame Texas law, then Gov. Bush, and federal funding for Abstinence-only education, Shelby and her peers never received anything close to an A-H funded abstinence education program. All A-H Abstinence Education programs were still in their infancy in 2001.

Plus, since none of these programs are allowed to be faith-based, there is no way that Shelby and her peers were exposed to or hurt by any of the A-H federally funded Abstinence Education programs that she and her new colleagues now seek to deride and defund.

So, while Shelby Knox has every right to complain about her personal sex ed experience when she was 15, she does not have the right to lump together her bad experience with Evidence-based abstinence-until-marriage programs that have been proven effective over the past decade.

We are worried about Shelby, who like so many her age, is being exploited by Sexual Rights Groups to promote sex without consequences and without boundaries; the very opposite intent of Welfare Reform.

Why punish anyone for sexual misconduct?

what is going on in our schools

As if we need more laws…

What if there were laws that prohibited the promotion or teaching of any behavior(s) that would be grounds for suspension/ expulsion?

 

This use to be called “contributing to the delinquency of a minor!” These types of laws would apply to students, school personnel, and visitors.

While grounds for suspension/expulsion vary, most students, teachers, and personnel, would be gone or at least be severely punished if they:

  • caused, attempted to cause, or threatened to cause physical injury to another person,
  • possessed, sold, or otherwise furnished any firearm, knife, explosive or other dangerous objects.
  • unlawfully possessed, used, sold, or otherwise furnished, or been under the influence of any controlled substance, or alcoholic beverage.
  • committed or attempted to commit robbery or extortion.
  • caused or attempted to cause damage to school property or private property.
  • stole or attempted to steal school or private property.
  • possessed or used tobacco, or any products containing tobacco or nicotine products.
  • committed an obscene act or engaged in habitual profanity or vulgarity.
  • unlawfully possessed, or unlawfully offered, arranged or negotiated to sell any drug paraphernalia.
  • disrupted school activities or otherwise willfully defied the valid authority of school officials.
  • knowingly received stolen school property or private property.
  • possessed an imitation firearm.
  • commit or attempted to commit a sexual offense, assault.
  • harassed, threatened, or intimidated a pupil who is a complaining witness in a school disciplinary action.
  • committed sexual harassment.
  • caused/attempted to cause/threatened to cause injury while participating in an act of hate violence.
  • made terrorist threats against school officials and/or school property.

We cannot imagine any public or private school allowing teachers to promote, teach or participate in any of the above behaviors or activities, unless it involved SEX.

In the case of SEX, the US actually spends Billions in taxpayer dollars to train sex educators to be alone in a class of students and teach them how to engage in sexual behaviors including oral sex, anal sex, sexual foreplay, intercourse, and condom negotiation skills.

Yet, if these same students were caught performing any of these sex acts on campus, in the back of the classroom, on a school bus, or at a school event they would be suspended, expelled or maybe arrested.

And, if it were proven that a teacher or school personnel performed sex acts with students, would they be fired, lose their license, face criminal charges, and/or be placed on a sexual offenders list? Maybe, or maybe not!

 Sexual Misconduct

Is this really fair? After all, many of today’s teachers and administrators have grown up with unbridled “safe sex” and are now teaching it to our children. Why should they or their students be punished for doing what is within their “sexual rights.”

Almost every state has implemented laws mandating that “safe sex” be taught to children from Kindergarten through 12th grade. Regardless of their supposed legal status as minors, children are being taught that “consensual” “safe sex” is the law of the land.

Anything goes as long as they want it!

How could any child feel safe in a school that promotes or turns a blind-eye to sexual activity?

What about the 1 in 4 girls and 1 in 6 boys who have been sexually abused in the US? Who are they supposed to turn to for help if the so-called “mandated reporters” in their school are supporting or condoning sexual activity with and among minors?

Does your child feel sexually safe at their school?

It seems that the safest place for a sexual predator is within the walls of your school. They have motive, opportunities to groom their victims, and access to your children.

We need to be just as vigilant about protecting our children from sexual influences and predators within our schools, as we are about protecting them from other dangerous behaviors.

Otherwise, there really are no ethical grounds for punishing them when they “sexually misbehave” at school.