Tag Archives: Sexual Rights Agenda

The Silent Link to Human Sex Trafficking

Featured

Posted on by
4

sex-trafficking-wordcloudComprehensive Sex Education (CSE) has indoctrinated generations in the Sexual Rights Agenda. We have been duped by Sexual Rights/CSE propaganda  that convinces us that it is our only hope to decrease teen pregnancies, STDs, sexual abuse, and drop out rates.

Most federally funded CSE programs have been a sham since the 90’s, claiming to be “evidence-based” and “medically accurate.” However, a federal report released in July 2016 reveals that many of these popular Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs (TPP) failed to replicate their “initial sterling” results. Valerie Huber, CEO/President of Ascend, a national Sexual Risk Avoidance organization, writes:

“After nearly a billion dollars, more than 80% of students in these “comprehensive” programs fared either worse or no better than their peers who were not in the program. Teens in some TPP-funded projects were even more likely to begin having sex, more likely to engage in oral sex, and more likely to get pregnant than their peers who weren’t in the classes.”

Watch The War on Children, The Comprehensive Sexuality Education Agenda

It is not surprising then to read that under the Obama Administration, human/child sex trafficking in the U.S. has exploded. For almost 8 years, the Obama Administration has fully funded the Sexual Rights Agenda either directly or indirectly with taxpayer dollars. Almost every federal agency, including Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the Department of Justice, has either promoted the Sexual Rights Agenda or turned a blind eye to it’s consequences. Except for the FBI.

The FBI is the primary federal agency that has diligently pursued human sex trafficking in the U.S. In 2015, pedophilia and human sex trafficking had reached an almost epidemic level as reported by the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division. According to Assistant Director Joseph Campbell:

“”The level of pedophilia is just unprecedented right now. We have so many cases constantly of individuals in all walks of life, from the very wealthy … to all other levels engaged in child pornography, child exploitation … it just seems to be almost an at epidemic level.”

The vast majority of the children trafficked in the U.S. are not Mexican or Central American, but are American.”

The Department of Justice made the 2016 Dirty Dozen list as a Top Facilitators of Sexual Exploitation by the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, which states,

“From the time Obama took office in 2008, no enforcement actions against illegal obscenity have been initiated by DOJ, and in 2011 former Attorney General Eric Holder dismantled the Obscenity Prosecution Task Force.” 

Still, these obscenity crimes only deal with adults, not minors. Today’s adults that engage in sexual exploitation were themselves minors just a few years ago!

What did they learn about sexual lifestyles and where did they learn it?

Comprehensive Sex Education (CSE) is the silent link that fuels the sexual exploitation of children, minors, women, men, and families. Through CSE indoctrination in our schools, children as young as Kindergarten are convinced that they have “rights” to sexual pleasure. CSE programs, under the guise of “anti-bullying,” “teen pregnancy and STD prevention,” “sex abuse prevention,” and now “equality” programs, often include sexually graphic content and/or pornography, which stimulates neurological/brain development towards sexual excitement.

Teachers trained in many CSE programs have the boundaries blurred between them and their students. They are trained to speak sexual and/or pornographic content to minors. Much of the content would get any of us locked up for sexual exploitation, yet it is mandated in many schools.

By normalizing sexual activity among and with children, they are setup for sexual exploitation. They expect to be approached for sexual favors and think nothing of exploring their sexuality before they can handle it. Our children are groomed and programed to look for sex in all of the worst places!

If we want to protect our children from sexual exploitation, pornographic CSE must be eliminated in our schools and communities. As legal minors, they deserve the legal protection promised them, whether they want it or not. That’s why they are minors!

Ignoring CSE’s link to sex trafficking just compounds the corruption and misery for future generations.

 

 

 

Charleston, SC: The Horns Come Out!

Featured

Posted on by
Reply

Mary S. McLellan, MS, SRAS ~ Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist

mens-scary-devil-horns-long-halloween-fancy-dress-9748-pLast week, the Charleston County School District had the audacity to protect the innocence of middle school students from the Sexual Rights Agenda. They voted unanimously to REJECT the Appendix to Making A Difference!, a Comprehensive Sex Education curriculum. The Board said that the Appendix contained inappropriate information for students in middle school.

 

Maybe it’s Halloween, but all Hell has broken loose! The horns are out from every Sexual Rights organization in and outside of South Carolina. How dare the school district defy them! The Sexual Rights Cartel is livid and won’t stop until parents and taxpayers tell them to shut-up and keep their hands off of children!

Who are these Sexual Rights organizations in SC demanding that minors learn how to have so-called “safe sex?” According to the media buzz, they are Women’s Rights & Empowerment Network – a new organization established by New Morning Foundation/Tell Them SC – Florence Crittenton, and Charleston County Teen Pregnancy Prevention Council, which is part of the SC Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. They all work in concert with the media: Post & Courier, Charleston Currents, and the National Coalition to Support Sexuality Education to promote the Sexual Rights Agenda through taxpayer supported government infrastructure.

The so-called “revised” Making A Difference! curriculum has not been evaluated for effectiveness and it is doubtful that it is any different or better from the original 1998 version. The original version was never evaluated in a school based setting. Even then…

“The study did not find any statistically significant program impacts on rates of sexual intercourse for adolescents who were sexually experienced at baseline, or on frequency of sexual intercourse, condom use, or unprotected sexual intercourse for the full sample. The study found no statistically significant program impacts for the follow-ups conducted six and 12 months after the program ended.”

Making A Difference! is touted as an “abstinence” program, but the title tells the true story: “Making A Difference!” An Abstinence Approach to Prevent STDs, HIV and Teen Pregnancy.” It is not an authentic abstinence education program because appropriate boundaries for sex, such as commitment, monogamy and marriage, are not discussed. Without boundaries anything is permissible! The term “abstinence approach” is often used to deceive school districts, teachers, parents and taxpayers into thinking that they are supporting an effective sex ed program.

Read more articles about Making A Difference! at ExposeSexEdNow.com.

Why is this program not age appropriate? Middle school students are typically 11-13 years old. They are minors, which means that they are legally incapable of consenting to sex. Laws are written to protect minors from sexual predators or anyone that would make them vulnerable to enticement into sexual activities. This is a very serious matter in our culture.

Charleston County School Board is more than justified in nixing the Making A Difference! Appendix. It includes information about sexual orientation (which is a violation of state law), inaccurate and misleading information about the effectiveness of condoms, and ambiguous language about the definition of abstinence. It also suggests that sexual foreplay is an appropriate alternative to intercourse, and it normalizes sexual relationships for minors.

Judge for yourself! Here are just a few examples found in the Making A Difference! Appendix:

  • Pg. 222-225. Role Plays about Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual relationships.
  • Pg. 228 #9. (True) or False. “Anyone who has unprotected sex or shares needles can get HIV.”
    • While this is technically a true statement, it is also true that ‘Anyone who has protected sex (condoms) can get HIV.’ People still get HIV, even when using a condom. Condoms do not make sex safe enough.
    • Adolescents are primarily concrete thinkers and their brains have not developed to the point of higher abstract and critical thinking. Most adolescents (11-13) will not notice the discrepancies in their statement, which implies that using a condom is ‘just about’ as safe as abstinence.
  • Pg. 229
    • #16. Implies that condoms are 100% effective at preventing HIV transmission.  This is medically inaccurate, in fact fraudulent, information. Condoms can only reduce the risk of HIV infection.
    • Pg. 229, #20. Suggests sexual foreplay ideas and defines all of the listed behaviors as “sexual behaviors.”
      • Legal minors are asked to select 3 “sexual behaviors” that will not exchange bodily fluids.
      • Avoiding bodily fluids is not the only danger of having sex. This activity implies that sex is OK as long as bodily fluids are not transmitted.
      • 11-13 year old minors are legally incapable of consenting to sex. To normalize sex for minors makes educators complicit in contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
    • 252. The definition of abstinence is inadequate, misleading, and narrowly focused only on sexual intercourse.
      • In Making A Difference!, as well as in most Comprehensive Sex Education programs, abstinence is often defined as “not engaging in sexual intercourse of any type (oral, anal or vaginal).” This definition allows for sexual foreplay, which can transmit STDs, and often leads to sexual intercourse.
      • The medically accurate and age appropriate definition for abstinence is “not engaging in any sexual activity of any type, including oral, anal or vaginal.

The Sexual Rights Cartel has exposed their horns. They are not interested in protecting kids. They only want access to them.

Write the Charleston County School Board today and tell them thank-you for protecting the innocence of children. They need support from parents for this decision.

RECALL: “Making A Difference!”

Featured

Posted on by
Reply

by Mary S. McLellan, MS, SRAS ~ Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist

massive-recall-for-takata-airbags1-791x445 Would you let your child’s life depend on an unreliable product that claims to only Reduce the Risks of harm? READ the research on “Making A Difference!” before you allow your child to take this course in middle school.

 

Back in 1998, the research design for “Making A Difference!” was considered strong and still, those results from a single study showed that the program only delayed sex for 3 months, in a small sample of 11-13 year old African American urban students, who – had NOT had sex.

However, at the 6 and 12 month evaluation, there was no impact on sexual initiation, sex, condom use, or unprotected sex. NO IMPACT!

“The study found that three months after the program ended, adolescents participating in the intervention who were sexually inexperienced at baseline were significantly less likely to report having had sexual intercourse in the previous 3 months. The study did not find any statistically significant program impacts on rates of sexual intercourse for adolescents who were sexually experienced at baseline, or on frequency of sexual intercourse, condom use, or unprotected sexual intercourse for the full sample. The study found no statistically significant program impacts for the follow-ups conducted six and 12 months after the program ended.”

This 18 year old program had only been evaluated ONCE; there were no replication studies to show that the same thing could happen again. (This is shoddy research.) Why was it deemed an Evidence-based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program and put on the US Health and Human Services’ and CDC’s list to push in public schools?

“Making A Difference!” has been promoted in public schools for eighteen years!

“Making A Difference!” has NEVER been officially evaluated in a school setting, but only in after-school and community settings (poor inner city minorities.) YET, it is widely used to teach all minors in school settings. Again, shoddy research and application!

“Making A Difference!” is touted as an “abstinence education program,” but uses the term “abstinence-approach” to fool school districts into thinking they have a proven effective abstinence education program.

An authentic Evidence-based Abstinence/Sexual Risk Avoidance Education program sets clear boundaries to avoid all sexual activity. Boundaries such as commitment, monogamy, and marriage. However, “Making A Difference!” does not set boundaries for how long the minor child is to delay sex. They teach…When you feel ready for sex. That could be today – right after school, this weekend, prom night, etc.

“”Making A Difference!” is an Abstinence Approach to Prevention of STDs, HIV and Teen Pregnancy is an eight module curriculum that provides young adolescents with the knowledge, confidence, and skills necessary to reduce their risk of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), HIV, and pregnancy by abstaining from sex. The curriculum is designed for middle school youth and is delivered by trained facilitators.”

“Making A Difference” is written by the Jemmotts, the same authors who wrote “Making Proud Choices!” and “Be Proud! Be Responsible.” They used a Sexual Risk Reduction approach, rather than a Sexual Risk Avoidance approach. Several of the Jemmott sex programs are advocated by Planned Parenthood, SIECUS, and other Sexual Rights Groups.

Sexual Risk Reduction means that as long as “protection” is used (condoms, birth control, alternative sex) then sex can be safe. Really? Is this what minors, who legally cannot consent to sex, need to hear? How has that been working for us over the past 20 years?

For more information, check out other articles on these programs at ExposeSexEdNow.com.

The Sexual Rights Cash Cow

Featured

Posted on by
Reply

by Mary S. McLellan, MS, SRAS ~ Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist

 

cow-cashHave you ever felt queasy about those sex programs in your child’s school or health clinic? Maybe you feel that your child is too young to know about oral, anal, and vaginal sex, and how lube can make sex more fun…but you say nothing.

Besides, all of the other parents are letting strangers teach their children about sex, so why shouldn’t you?

Or, maybe you caved, because Educrats and Sexperts have convinced you that they know better than you what is best for your child?

Your gut is right and you should have trusted it! Some of the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs promoted and funded with your tax dollars were re-evaluated over the past five years and FAILED miserably. Buried in the HHS website is the evidence that these programs fared no better than general health classes at reducing teen sex or increasing condom use. In fact, some of the programs increased teen sex and pregnancies!

Thanks to Ascend CEO Valerie Huber, these evaluations released in July 2016 are exposed in this press release. Ascend is the only credentialing organization in the U.S. that trains professionals in Sexual Risk Avoidance (SRA), a public health model for optimal ascend-infographic-on-csesexual health. You can read more in Obama’s promiscuous sex-ed program a failure. Also, click on the Infographic (right) for a quick look or here for a more detailed summary of the findings.

Parents must find out if these failed Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) programs are still in their schools and community organizations: Carrera Program (Children’s Aid Society), Cuidate, It’s Your Game: Keep It Real, PHAT! Abstinence-Only Intervention (Promoting Health Among Teens), Reducing the Risk, Safer Sex, Seventeen Days, Teen Outreach Program, and BART (Becoming A Responsible Teen).

We need a massive recall of these programs!

Don’t be duped by so-called “adaptations” of old or failed programs. Adaptations are simply a slick move by HHS to revamp the same failed sex programs without evaluating them. If the core is rotten, the entire product is disgusting!

While, most of the HHS Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs are a scam, there is one exception. Heritage Keepers® Abstinence Education is the only authentic Sexual Risk Avoidance program that has been proven effective at increasing abstinence among teens. Heritage Keepers® promotes abstinence-outside-of-marriage. After one year, Heritage Keepers® students initiated sexual activity at a rate that is 67% lower than students not receiving the program.

Today, we have generations of indoctrinated millennials and those younger who think that aberrant sexual lifestyles are the norm. They have been taught that everyone, regardless of age, has the right to sex, as long as they have consent.

Really? Sexual predators groom their victims to consent to sex.

American parents must wake up. You have been used and abused by the Sexual Rights Agenda. You are their Cash Cow. They have taken your money, your children, and your marriages.

Now, they want to take away your future.

 

First Ladies of Africa Push Back!

Featured

Posted on by
Reply

taxdollarsatworkWhat does “reproductive health” mean to you? To the US and the United Nations (UN), “reproductive health” means unlimited access to abortion. The baby’s health – and life – are not important.  Abortion is the solution to all human problems and it must be normalized to the entire world.

 

Abortion is often introduced through Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) by Sexual Rights Groups. Pro-life advocates need to pay attention to CSE, because it has indoctrinated generations into the Sexual Rights culture. (Find Member Organizations of the National Coalition to Support Sexuality Education in the US)

The UN continues its push for abortion rights in Africa under the guise of CSE, which only promotes condoms and contraception. Advocates are careful not to mention abortion, but lay the foundation for it by addressing forced marriages, female mutilation, and sexual violence against girls.

The Center for Family and Human Rights (C-Fam) posted an article entitled UN Agencies Enlist African First Ladies to Sanitize “Reproductive Health” and Sex Ed, which reveals that many of the First Ladies are not deceived about the US/UN’s agenda to destroy their families through sexuality education.

In fact, several first ladies used the opportunity to speak positively about the family and African culture and tradition, both of which are frequently characterized at the UN as barriers to sexual and reproductive rights.  The First Lady of Burkina Faso quoted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights description of the family as “the natural and fundamental group unit of society,” while the First Lady of Namibia referred to traditional practices as “the glue that keeps our societies together.”

The First Lady of Nigeria stressed the importance for adolescent girls of understanding the balance of freedom and responsibility, especially in the context of sex education, which she said must teach about the “dangers of indulgence and licentious behavior and the importance of abstinence and self-control.”

While abortion is illegal in many African nations, the UN is relentless in normalizing it as the only solution to all of Africa’s problems. The First Lady of Namibia called out the UN, and the US government, for pushing their “one size fits all” agenda onto African nations.

Why does the US and United Nations persist in their subversive takeover of other nations with their Sexual Rights ideologies? How far will the United Nations Population Fund and the International Planned Parenthood Federation go to normalize deviant sexual practices that violate the values of other nations?

As far as the voters and taxpayers will allow it.

Sexual Rights Agenda: Activism or Terrorism?

Featured

Posted on by
Reply

hedonism-word-cloudThose behind the Sexual Rights Agenda do not live by the Golden Rule. This is evidenced by their aggressive take-over of schools, universities, government agencies, and even other nations. Militant Sexual Rights operatives, including the Obama administration and the UN, are demanding their way or else… they will make our lives a living hell.

 

There is no middle ground as LGBTQ/Planned Parenthood/Comprehensive Sex Ed is forced on ALL public school children. Parental Rights do not matter either, as proven repeatedly by hostile School Districts and government bureaucrats.

If it’s any consolation, many in the LGBTQ camp

are also sick and tired of the US propaganda to promote the Sexual Rights Agenda!

Read “Even Political Left Frustrated with US Focus on Everything Homosexual!”

 

Vile sexually explicit information is forced on legal minors, who deserve to be protected by law, not violated. Such programs within Comprehensive Sex Ed promote Child Porn and Child Sexual Abuse, which BTW are illegal in the US. However, laws are not consistently enforced. This is one reason why the Department of Justice made the 2016 Dirty Dozen List of Leading Facilitators of Sexual Exploitation.

Judith Reisman has dedicated her life to exposing the fraudulent research of Alfred Kinsey. Watch Reisman lecturing on CSPAN in 2012 about Kinsey and his legacy of Child Porn. Pornographic sex acts are taught in some Comprehensive Sex Ed programs, which are funded with our tax dollars!

Today’s sex educators (willing or not) are trained to be child molesters within their schools.  According to the FBI, child molesters:

  • Demonstrate sex acts to children. Offenders commonly use pornography to teach or give instructions to naïve children about how to masturbate, perform oral sex and/or engage in sexual intercourse.

  • Lower the sexual inhibitions of children. Some children naturally fear sexual activities. Some offenders show pictures of other children engaging in sexual activities to overcome these fears, indicating to their intended victims that it is all right to have sex with an adult because lots of other boys and girls do the same thing.

  • Desensitize children to sex. Offenders commonly show child pornography to their intended victims to expose them to sexual acts before they are naturally curious about such activities.

  • Sexually arouse children. Offenders commonly use pornographic images of other children to arouse victims, particularly those in adolescence.

If the FBI can spot child molesters, why not teachers and those who train them? Why is obscenity allowed in our schools, when registered sex offenders cannot go near a school? Are schools protected from obscenity laws? If any of us spoke this way to a neighbors’ child or in the work place, we would arrested. What kind of person wants to teach this information to children?

The Sexual Rights Agenda is based solely on ideology – not science or medically accurate information. Teaching minors to experiment with sex and have sex with anyone – at any time – is exploitation. And, teaching them that they can or should change their gender is beyond abhorrent to most of us. There is plenty of scientific/medical evidence and experience that this type of indoctrination is false and dangerous to the public health of our nation. Many victims who decided to transition to the opposite gender have testified that they regret doing so. And, some have transitioned back to their birth gender with messed up lives and missing body parts.

Parents (and taxpayers), we can no longer hide or be neutral on these sexual issues. Many of us have tried to live under the radar and go-along-to-get-along for decades. There is no such thing as neutrality or accommodating the Militant Sexual Rights Agenda., especially for people of faith.

Read Rod Dreher’s excellent article, We Have Been Warned and listen to On paying a price for your beliefs – The Benedict Option from the American Defense Fund/Freedom Matters.

If your state still allows parents to opt-out of sex ed, it does not mean that their child’s friends won’t tell or text them what they learned in sex class. Plus, many sex programs are designed to cross curricula or influence the entire student body and school administration.

Read “At the Intersection of Sex Ed and English” and “Using YA lit for sex-ed: More than birds and bees.”

Many of us have sacrificed financially to enroll our kids in private or religious schools. Do you know what is taught about sex and marriage in those schools?  Who are their peers? Parents have told us that their 5 and 6 year old children learned about oral sex at sleep overs. Private or religious schools are not always exempt from governmental control or mandates, either.

Many parents choose to home school their children. And, many home schooled kids are experts on computers where they easily access porn. What about youth groups and other home schooled peers? We know of youth who were home schooled their entire lives, yet were exploited and/or introduced to porn at their churches, or through sports, Boy Scouts or Girl Scouts. Remember that home school parents also pay taxes that support the Sexual Right Agenda.

None of us can hide from the Sexual Rights Gestapo. The state religion is Hedonism and subjects must bow down or else. We must know what we believe and why we believe it. It is up to decent law abiding parents and taxpayers with deep faith convictions to stand up for what they believe.

Our kids are watching!

 

To read more…

St. Louis, Missouri – Parents Protest Planned Parenthood Sex Ed

Omaha, Nebraska – Parents Opt-Out and church support

Hostile Takeover by the US Government

Who are these people?

If your school district is still teachable:

STD Germ Pool: A Public Health Crisis

Featured

Posted on by
1

Mary S. McLellan, M.S., SRAS ~ ExposeSexEdNow.com

 

ARCpoint-Labs-CDC-Reports-2012-STD-Rates-on-the-RiseThe CDC reports that cases of Chlamydia and Syphilis are at all-time highs, especially among the LGBTQ and Sexual Rights populations. Even worse, the presence of any STD increases the susceptibility for other STDs, including HIV.

The STD Germ Pool expands.

Meanwhile, the CDC, US Health and Human Services and US Department of Education continue to fund and promote LGBTQ and Sexual Rights groups and causes. So, taxpayer funding is used by LGBTQ and Sexual Rights groups to force taxpayers to condone, endorse, normalize, subsidize, and institutionalize unhealthy lifestyle choices that can only lead to more STDs, misery, and chaos.

This is government cronyism.

To allow the LGBTQ and Sexual Rights Agenda precedence in our society defies proven successful public health policies. Less than 4% of the US adult population self-identify as LGBTQ and only .3% self-identify as transgender. Why does this very tiny percentage of our population get to set policies and influence laws that can and do negatively affect over 96% of others? Good public health policies are meant to communicate optimal health and safety standards for the masses.

Does this mean that the CDC seeks to convert us all into LGBTQ and Sexual Rights advocates?

Are taxpayers expected to just shut up and pay up?

 Apparently, yes. This is tyranny, not a democracy!

The CDC’s stated public health policy on preventing STDs is “the most reliable way to avoid STDs is to abstain from all sexual activity or be in a long-term mutually monogamous relationship with an uninfected partner.”

Contrary to their policy, the CDC operates a double standard when it pertains to sexual rights. Any other health and safety risks, such as alcohol, tobacco, drugs, and violence require strict avoidance policies, not indulgences. The CDC would never provide liquor, cigarettes, heroin, and guns for the masses, yet they promote sexual behaviors to the masses through public education.

The CDC and other agencies endorse and fund Comprehensive Sex Ed (CSE) programs that teach minors how to engage in sexual behaviors. Many school districts across the US are forced through regulations, funding, and intimidation to only use CSE programs that fail to teach the skills to avoid sexual activity.

CSE is based on Kinsey’s fraudulent and discredited “science” and was never intended to prevent sexual activity. The primary goal has always been to promote sexual rights. According to Kinsey, humans are sexual from birth, therefore, CSE programs teach that sexual activity is healthy, normal, and expected from birth. Public health and safety are secondary if considered at all.

Every trick is played to get CSE/Kinsey’s sex ideology taught to your child from K4-12th grade and throughout society. Some programs are disguised as Sexual Abuse Prevention, Anti-bullying, Human Sexuality, Safe and Healthy Schools, Family Life, and/or STD and Pregnancy Prevention. All are modeled after Kinsey and his pedophiles’ sexual abuse of infants and children.

Without dispute, the earlier that children and teens begin participating in sexual activity, the more lifetime sex partners they will have. The expected results are more STDs, pregnancies, abortions, and failed relationships leading to more dependency on welfare programs. This racket is about money and power at the expense of countless victims.

The government finances LGBTQ and Sexual Rights groups, as well as, a flourishing sex industry. They, in turn, produce a never ending supply of customers involved in sexual abuse, sex trafficking, prostitution, and pornography, who seek health services for STDs, contraception, and abortions. And, so it goes… on and on…

Optimal public health for the masses must be the primary focus of any sexual rights debate.The masses should not be bullied into submission by a minute minority, especially when their sexual behaviors endanger the public’s health and safety.

That’s why it’s called “public health.”

Sexual Rights Agenda: Confuse the Masses

Featured

Posted on by
Reply

by Mary McLellan and Robert Swain

Sexual Rights Advocates claim victory for the lowest teen birth rates in decades. But, why are the rates at an all-time low? Is it really due to “safe sex” education in the schools and the push to get all girls on birth control?

Or, are teens making better decisions and refusing to engage in sex, so that they can focus on their future?

It is laughable that Sexual Rights Advocates claim responsibility for the majority of teens delaying sex! Their programs do not teach Sexual Risk Avoidance (SRA) skills to abstain from sex. In fact, most of their sex programs teach Sexual Risk Reduction (SRR) skills to “avoid unprotected sex” and “to enjoy the pleasures of “safe sex.”

How can teens focus on their future in such a sexually charged climate?

The goal of the Sexual Rights Agenda is to confuse the uninformed public. They do this by masking the content of most sex programs, keeping the media hype going, and demanding that hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars continue to flow in their direction.

It is true that teen pregnancy and birth rates are at their lowest in decades. Yet, the Sex Cartels demand that “more taxpayer money is needed, state laws must be changed, and more must be done, because one unplanned pregnancy is just too many.”

This false narrative convinces school districts and legislators that only SRR (“safe sex”) programs will work, because “all teens will have sex.” These programs are pushed by the Sex Cartels, including Planned Parenthood, SIECUS, LGBTQ, Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, Advocates for Youth, and the CDC.

However, if one really looks at the data a different narrative emerges. In South Carolina (SC), SRR advocates receive millions in taxpayer dollars annually to expand into more and more schools. And, they claim that they are responsible for the dramatic 68% decrease in pregnancy rates for teens (15-17) and 80% decrease for adolescents (10-14). (SC DHEC 2015)

This decline is not a phenomenon, but consistent with national trends. Plus, the CDC’s YRBS (Youth Risk Behavior Survey) for SC reveals that for almost 20-years, most sexually experienced teens have NOT used contraception. They are not practicing “safe-sex.” There has been a:

  •  26% increase (2005-2013) in teens who did not use a condom during last sexual intercourse.
  • 83% of girls did not use birth control pills to prevent pregnancy before last sexual intercourse. (UNCHANGED since 1995)
  • 97% of girls did not use an IUD before last sexual intercourse.

The SC YRBS also reveals that only 32% of high school teens were sexually active at the time of the survey. In addition, there was a:

  • 28% decrease in high school teens who have EVER had sex. (1995-2013)
  • 49% decrease in 9th grade teens who have EVER had sex. (1995-2013)
  • 30% decrease in high school teens who are sexually active. (1995-2013)

In other words, over the past 18 years:

  • Sexually active SC high school teens have not been practicing “safe-sex.” (SRR education has failed in SC for decades and  they don’t want you to know it!)
  • The majority of SC high school teens were not having sex and/or have NEVER had sex!
  • The percentage of sexually experienced high school teens has decreased steadily since 1995.

Most SC students are not duped by the “all teens are having sex, so you better protect yourself” mantras that are chanted in sex classes. Rather, smart teens embrace the SRA (abstinence) messages promoted by their parents, churches, and agencies that teach Evidence-based Abstinence Education.

Teens will live up to high standards! So, we should set high standards for them and for ourselves.

Such progress bodes well for SC, but only if the current trend continues. SRA (abstinence) should be taught as a separate component for all school age children. To omit this vital perspective from schools is censorship.

 

“Safe Sex” education sets our kids up for failure and it defeats the purpose of quality education.

 

 

Charleston, SC: Bogus CRISIS! in Teen Pregnancy

Featured

Posted on by
Reply

don-t-believe-the-hype-t-shirts_design

Sexual Rights Advocates claim the victory for the lowest teen pregnancy rates in decades. They even claim responsibility for the majority of teens choosing to abstain from sex, yet none of their programs promote sexual abstinence or teach the skills to do so.

In order to keep the media hype going and millions of taxpayer dollars flowing in their direction, these teen sex advocates must claim victory where there is none. They use these bogus claims to convince school districts that all teens will have sex so that they will adopt their Planned Parenthood Sex Programs, exclusively, for middle and high school students.

Teen pregnancy rates have been trending downward for well over two decades. In SC, abstinence-until-marriage education was first funded in 1996 under Welfare Reform. Until then, condoms-only programs were the norm, resulting in skyrocketing teen pregnancy rates. Since 1996, pregnancy rates for teens (15-17) and adolescents (10-14) have dramatically decreased by 60% and 80%, respectively.

SC 15-17 Preg Rate

SC 10-14 Preg Rate

Heritage Keepers® is the predominant Abstinence-Until-Marriage Education program used in South Carolina schools over the past two decades. It is the only abstinence-until-marriage program in the nation listed by U.S. HHS as an Evidence-Based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program.(2012) This list of 35 programs is used by school districts to select sex education programs for their students. 

Independent evaluation of Heritage Keepers® in SC public schools reveals that a year after the program, Heritage Keepers® students initiated sexual activity at a rate that is 67% lower than non-program students.

This evaluation included 2,215 sexually experienced and inexperienced students in 7th, 8th, and 9th grade, with 63% of the students African-American.

Heritage Keepers® was shown to be effective across age, gender, and race.

These are amazing behavioral outcomes in the science of teen pregnancy prevention.

In Charleston County, Heritage Keepers® is the only Abstinence-Until-Marriage Education program approved for the public schools, while “safe sex” condom programs are also on the list. When Heritage Keepers® Certified Educators arrive on campus, the sexual climate of the entire school changes. 

Students choosing to abstain feel validated, and those contemplating a return to abstinence are empowered to follow through on their goals.

Pregnancy rates in Charleston have declined even more dramatically than the state, with pregnancy rates for teens (15-17) and adolescents (10-14) decreasing by 72% and 90%, respectively.

Charleston 15-17 Preg Rate

 

Charleston 10-14 Preg Rate

 

 

 

So, is contraception use driving down pregnancy rates? Not according to the most recent CDC Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) for SC released in 2014.

According to the YRBS, only 32% of SC high school teens were currently sexually active at the time of the survey. That means that almost 70% of high school teens in SC were not having sex! Who knew?

The survey also showed that there was a:

  • 26% increase (2005-2013) in teens who DID NOT USE a condom during last sexual intercourse.
  • 80% of girls DID NOT USE birth control pills to prevent pregnancy before last sexual intercourse. (UNCHANGED since 1995), and
  • 95% of girls DID NOT USE an IUD before last sexual intercourse.

The YRBS further reveals that between 1995 and 2013 more teens abstained from sexual activity. There was a:

  • 28% decrease in high school teens who have EVER had sex.
  • 49% decrease in 9th grade teens who have EVER had sex.
  • 46% decrease in 4 or more life time partners.
  • 30% decrease in high school teens who are sexually active.

Clearly, contraception is not the only reason that pregnancy rates have decreased, since their use has flat lined. The facts show that sexually active teens are not increasing contraception use! And, more teens are abstaining from sex.

Since “safe sex” condom programs used in SC do not teach teens how to abstain from sexual activity or teach about the benefits of abstinence and marriage, how can they take credit for any increases in abstinent behaviors?

They can’t, but they do!

The complicit media will not report the good news from the YRBS, because it does not fit the Sexual Rights narrative. They continue the drum beat demanding that abstinence-until-marriage education programs have failed and must be kicked out of schools in favor of Planned Parenthood Sex Programs.

Don’t believe the hype about a teen pregnancy crisis in need of the Planned Parenthood solution.

It is only a distraction to hide the Sexual Rights Agenda, which has nothing to do with health. It has everything to do with recruiting adolescents and teens into a sexual lifestyle that benefits their business model.

It’s all about the money.

 

 

 

Charleston Parents Outraged: Making Proud Choices!

Posted on by
1

AAmind-in-the-gutterWhile children are out of school and many families are away this summer, the Sexual Rights Agenda presses on to advance yet another sex program for approval in our schools. This time, it is Making Proud Choices! which we have covered many times.

Last week, a public hearing was held by the Charleston County School Board to discuss and vote on the adoption of Making Proud Choices! sex education program. Local and state SexPerts packed the room to support their program. These SexPerts included PhDs from Medical University – Department of Psychiatry, Planned Parenthood, New Morning Foundation, ACLU, and other advocates of Sexual Rights indoctrination in public schools.

Only 1-minute speeches were allowed. The SexPerts spouted typical Planned Parenthood/Sexual Rights talking points, revealing that many had never seen the curriculum in question. They accused protestors of “having their heads in the sand” or “living in a bubble,” while they are the ones living in their ivory towers with their minds in the gutter! They claimed that the program teaches abstinence without revealing that abstinence to them has no timeframe and is nothing more than “avoiding unprotected sex.”

The protestors of Making Proud Choices!, many of whom had spent days researching and reviewing the curriculum, voiced factual opposition based on obscene content, violation of SC Law and common decency standards, and a gross lack of any real prevention education. Most of these protestors actually work in the trenches with real people suffering the consequences of our sexualized culture. They have done their homework.

Ironically, the proponents in the school district used the term “Reproductive Health Education,” instead of the oft criticized term “Comprehensive” or “Sex Education.” Ironic because Making Proud Choices! is void of any education about “Reproduction.” Shouldn’t that be basic?  

“Reproductive Health Education” is about Rights, not Reproduction!

Making Proud Choices! does not teach students the skills to avoid sexual activity, nor does it teach them how to form a future healthy family within marriage. The content and activities clearly intend to encourage and normalize sex among and with minors.

We know that kids are targeted every day with porn on the streets and through media, internet, and smart phones. Why do the SexPerts want to reinforce the exploitation and saturate kids’ minds with even more sex in schools? Schools should be a safe zone for academics, not sexual indoctrination. 

These Sexual Rights Advocates cannot seem to get their “minds out of the gutter” as they create future customers for lucrative sex industries.

Thankfully, the Trustees decided to postpone a vote until the next meeting on Tuesday, August 4th at 9 AM at the School District. They had not seen the curriculum either! They requested a final version with all edits and adaptations. We will see if that happens.

Decent citizens of Charleston County need to speak out against Making Proud Choices!, which is targeting 11-14 year old minor children for a Medical University Psychiatry research project.

Email the Charleston County School Trustees and tell them to VOTE NO! to Making Proud Choices!

Go to the meeting on Tuesday, August 4th to protest this porno-graphic program.

Read all of the coverage on Making Proud Choices!