PP-Network Takes Credit for Teen Abstinence??

1 in 4 girls has ever had sexWhile the Planned Parenthood Network (PP-Network) pumps out endless propaganda bashing abstinence-until-marriage education and takes credit for the dramatic decreases in teen pregnancies, CDC data shows that teens (15-17) have been abstaining from sex, at increasing rates, over the past decade. The most recent data shows that almost 75% of teens (15-17) nationally surveyed by the CDC, have not had sex.

To the PP-Network, the only problem with sex is that it makes babies and BABIES ARE A REAL PROBLEM for them. Sexual Rights is the PP-Network’s agenda. Therefore, whatever it takes to prevent babies from being conceived, developing or born is the goal of the sex and abortion industry.

Why is the PP-Network so OFFENDED by abstinence-until-marriage education?

Because, abstinence-until-marriage education promotes MARRIAGE and FIDELITY WITHIN MARRIAGE.

The PP-Network has no problem saying that they believe in abstinence, as long as they get to define what abstinence means. To them, oral sex, anal sex, and mutual masturbation are the same as abstinence, because these sex acts do not make babies.

And, these SexPerts have no problem telling kids to abstain, as long as there are no restrictions on how long they must wait. Abstinence to them can be until teens are 13, 16, 18 or whenever they feel they are ready to be “proud and responsible” enough to use condoms and take toxic hormones.

This is why Comprehensive Sex Education is such a farce. It is not, and cannot be, “comprehensive” since it would have to teach all views on the purposes of sex.

The PP view of sex ed is to promote hedonism without forming a family while Abstinence-Until-Marriage Education promotes romance and healthy family formation, within marriage, resulting in connected generations of families.

There is no comprehensive program or curriculum that could attempt to teach both views, with a straight face. It would be ludicrous! Which view do you think will provide the best future for your child?

Proponents of Comprehensive Sex Education claim that it covers abstinence and contraception and everything in between. Except that it doesn’t. What they hide from the public, and especially parents, is the fact that they do not teach about marriage, family formation, or the responsibilities of raising children. They teach sex.

Proponents also do not want it exposed that add-on programs, like Making A Difference! and Making Proud Choices!, both listed on PP’s website, teach sexual foreplay and intercourse, under the guise of STD prevention, so that condoms can be taught to younger and younger kids. However, sexual foreplay also spreads STDs. Medically Accurate?

Abstinence-Until-Marriage education is the exact opposite of the PP-Network’s Sexual Rights Agenda in the following ways:

Abstinence-Until-Marriage programs are holistic, meaning that humans are viewed as whole beings with value and uniqueness. The act of sex biologically impacts the mind, body, emotions and spirit as humans engage in it, even if there is no intercourse. This is why humans are different. We are not animals.

  • The PP-Network’s Sexual Rights Agenda views humans as genitals to be fondled, and maybe if convenient, protected from disease with condoms. Little girls and women are to use hormones to prevent or get rid of pregnancies. In the end, humans are simply sex toys for someone else’s pleasure. This is why the PP-Networks want no limits or restrictions on sex.  

Abstinence-Until-Marriage programs teach students that abstinence means not engaging in sexual activity until marriage, including vaginal, oral, anal sex and mutual masturbation. Such programs also teach about the dangers of porn, sexting, and cohabitation.

  • The PP-Network’s Sexual Rights Agenda promotes unbridled sexual activity – at any age – with anyone or anything – as long as there is “consent” – whatever that means.

Abstinence-Until-Marriage promotes life-long, faithful marriage. The social sciences have proven that there are at least Thirty Benefits of Marriage and that children fare best on all social indicators when raised by their own two married parents.

  • The PP-Network’s Sexual Rights Agenda seeks to destroy marriage as an institution and therefore the traditional family. Even the gay marriage movement is just a Progressive ploy to gradually redefine the family and get rid of marriage as an institution and a societal good. None of the sex programs for schools listed on the PP website promote marriage, even for gay couples.

Abstinence-Until-Marriage promotes the fact that sex is wonderful and creates intimacy – within the context of marriage. When sex takes place within a marriage, it is more likely to be safer than outside of marriage. Research has shown that married couples have more sex and more satisfying sex than singles.

  • The PP-Network’s Sexual Rights agenda promotes sex without boundaries, especially without the restraints of marriage, monogamy, or commitment. They portray an unrealistic, unsatisfying, and false view of “Hollywood” sex to get people of all ages hooked on sexual pleasures.    

Abstinence-Until-Marriage promotes the fact that waiting until one has finished their education, and married before having sex and children is the best way to become an economically self-sufficient and prosperous member of society with a stable family life.

  • The PP-Network’s Sexual Rights agenda teaches that humans are sexual from birth and need to have sex in order to mature properly. (Alfred Kinsey/SIECUS) They target poor, minority, inner city neighborhoods to push their sex without boundaries, contraception and abortion agenda. This increases the risks of generational poverty, drop-out rates, and unwed childbearing. 
  • Planned Parenthood receives millions of taxpayer dollars annually to promote their agenda, plus they are large part of Obamacare so the revolving door of poverty and dependency will continue to spin out of control.

So, why are teen pregnancy rates declining? For many reasons.

According to several CDC reports, more and more teens are choosing to delay sex and those who are having sex are being more selective. The PP Network cannot take credit for the increase in abstinence, because they do not seriously teach it.

Real credit needs to go to the smart teens themselves who are choosing to abstain. Also, to parents, faith leaders and educators who really care about kids and are not afraid to tell them to delay sex until marriage.

Let’s not give credit to those who are promoting a Sexual Rights Agenda and are being paid by the sex industries.

That would be a farce.

61% Decline in SC Teen Pregnancy Rates!

Who knewTeen Pregnancy Rates in South Carolina have dramatically decreased since abstinence-until-marriage programs were integrated into the state’s public schools in 1995.

Until then, teen pregnancy rates were at an all-time high due to HIV Condoms-Only programs that had saturated the state.

Coincidentally, Heritage Keepers®, a non-profit established in 1995 and the first statewide recipient of Title V, Section 510 Abstinence-Until-Marriage funding under Welfare Reform (1996), was implemented and continues to be the most effective abstinence-until-marriage program in the state, and the nation.

SC Teen Pregnancy Picture

(Pregnancy rates are defined as “the estimated number of the sum of live births, abortions, and fetal deaths.” Therefore, regardless of the outcome of the pregnancy, rates have decreased drastically.)

The Planned Parenthood Sex Ed Network, and the complicit media, certainly do not want you to know this and, in fact, they are taking credit for all drops in national teen pregnancy rates, even for the almost 75% of teens (15-17) who have not had sex! (CDC)

Using CDC’s own data, if only a fraction of the 25% of teens (15-17) nationally, who are currently sexually active used condoms, or birth control, then it stands to reason that the pregnancy rates would decrease.

But, there is no way the amazing decreases in teen pregnancies nationally would, or could, be primarily due to contraception!

imagesCA4NUD1CIt is a matter of common sense and biology, that not having sex (abstinence) is the best way to decrease pregnancies and it is by far the safest method. Teens are absolutely capable and willing to abstain if they are given the medically accurate, age appropriate information that they need and the skills to set high standards for their behavior.

Certified Heritage Keepers® Educators have taught in schools that also provide condoms-only programs. Those so-called “safe sex” programs have never deterred the staff at Heritage Keepers®, who believe that, regardless of sexual history or sexual orientation, every student deserves to know the benefits of marriage, the benefits of abstinence-until-marriage, and to learn the skills to achieve their goals.

This is why a year after the Heritage Keepers® program, students abstain at a rate 3 times greater than students not receiving the program. Even when students are being exposed to Sexual Foreplay programs in the same schools! Students know the difference between real abstinence and counterfeit abstinence programs.

Students who are abstaining, or want to abstain, feel validated in their decisions just by knowing that Heritage Keepers® is in their school and community! And, teens, who learn that they can have real control over their lives, want to avoid the sexual pressures in their culture, and escape the DRAMA, poverty and shattered dreams that sex outside of marriage can bring.

Heritage Keepers® continues to be the ONLY Abstinence-Until-Marriage Education program on the US HHS list of proven effective Evidence-based programs. It continues to be the ONLY proven effective Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program listed that changes teen attitudes and behavior regarding abstinence until marriage.

Don’t be fooled by imitation Abstinence Education programs! If the programs in your schools and community do not promote marriage and abstinence until marriage, they are not teaching boundaries and neuro-science tells us that teens need boundaries for healthy brain development and to reach their potential.

Abstinence-Until-Marriage programs, when implemented effectively by educators who believe in what they are teaching, can and will reduce teen pregnancies and that means fewer single teen moms struggling to make ends meet.

For the already drained taxpayers, it means fewer reasons for lawmakers to increase taxes to support these fragile families. 

South Carolina has a long way to go to aleviate poverty due to out-of-wedlock births, but teen pregnancy rates (15-17) are going in the right direction.

Check out Heritage Keepers® today so that your state, your church’s youth group, and your community can also get on the right road to success.

 

 

Stop the Sexts! Stop the Wrecks!

sexting 2

What would your teen do if their sex teacher taught them how to “enhance the mood” for sex with condoms by:

  • Using extra lubrication inside and outside the condom,
  • Using different colors and types/textures,
  • Telling their partner that using a condom can make a man last longer,
  • Letting the partner put the condom on the penis,
  • Having a sense of humor and making jokes,
  • Putting lubricant on the tip of the penis to increase sensitivity or use lubricated condoms,
  • Talking about it in advance, and
  • Having condoms open and ready to use?

sexting 4

 If your teens are allowed to have a phone at school, the above classroom “instructions” would be sexted all over campus within minutes.

 The entire climate of the school is sexualized.

Forget about learning anything else that week!

 After school, kids are sexting each other to “enhance the mood” and practice before you get home from work.  But, don’t worry because the sex teacher also tells them:

  • To only buy condoms that are latex or polyurethane.
  • To not use condoms that are “glow in the dark.” “They are only gag gifts.”
  • That they are not “endorsing sexual activity among teenagers!”

What is the sex program? Making Proud Choices! Module 7 Developing Condom Use Skills, and similar instructions are also in Be Proud! Be Responsible! for High School

Making Proud Choices! is a “Safer-Sex Approach” curriculum and Be Proud! Be Responsible! is an “Evidence-based Intervention.” Neither are abstinence education programs, yet school districts and parents are being told that they are age-appropriate Comprehensive Health Education programs that fulfill their state Law.

Planned Parenthood Sex Ed Advocates are playing with our teens lives. Everyone knows that teens text each a lot, and with 75% of teens saying that their peers text and drive, it is not a stretch to predict that teens are in danger of sexting, driving and having wrecks.

Not only are teens, and their parents, duped into believing that sex can be made safe by engaging in sexual foreplay and intercourse as long as condoms are used, they are being enticed into sexting in order to “enhance the mood” prior to getting it on!

Parents, the only “proud and responsible” thing to do is to kick these Sexual Foreplay programs (Comprehensive Sex Ed) out of your schools!

Why punish anyone for sexual misconduct?

what is going on in our schools

As if we need more laws…

What if there were laws that prohibited the promotion or teaching of any behavior(s) that would be grounds for suspension/ expulsion?

 

This use to be called “contributing to the delinquency of a minor!” These types of laws would apply to students, school personnel, and visitors.

While grounds for suspension/expulsion vary, most students, teachers, and personnel, would be gone or at least be severely punished if they:

  • caused, attempted to cause, or threatened to cause physical injury to another person,
  • possessed, sold, or otherwise furnished any firearm, knife, explosive or other dangerous objects.
  • unlawfully possessed, used, sold, or otherwise furnished, or been under the influence of any controlled substance, or alcoholic beverage.
  • committed or attempted to commit robbery or extortion.
  • caused or attempted to cause damage to school property or private property.
  • stole or attempted to steal school or private property.
  • possessed or used tobacco, or any products containing tobacco or nicotine products.
  • committed an obscene act or engaged in habitual profanity or vulgarity.
  • unlawfully possessed, or unlawfully offered, arranged or negotiated to sell any drug paraphernalia.
  • disrupted school activities or otherwise willfully defied the valid authority of school officials.
  • knowingly received stolen school property or private property.
  • possessed an imitation firearm.
  • commit or attempted to commit a sexual offense, assault.
  • harassed, threatened, or intimidated a pupil who is a complaining witness in a school disciplinary action.
  • committed sexual harassment.
  • caused/attempted to cause/threatened to cause injury while participating in an act of hate violence.
  • made terrorist threats against school officials and/or school property.

We cannot imagine any public or private school allowing teachers to promote, teach or participate in any of the above behaviors or activities, unless it involved SEX.

In the case of SEX, the US actually spends Billions in taxpayer dollars to train sex educators to be alone in a class of students and teach them how to engage in sexual behaviors including oral sex, anal sex, sexual foreplay, intercourse, and condom negotiation skills.

Yet, if these same students were caught performing any of these sex acts on campus, in the back of the classroom, on a school bus, or at a school event they would be suspended, expelled or maybe arrested.

And, if it were proven that a teacher or school personnel performed sex acts with students, would they be fired, lose their license, face criminal charges, and/or be placed on a sexual offenders list? Maybe, or maybe not!

 Sexual Misconduct

Is this really fair? After all, many of today’s teachers and administrators have grown up with unbridled “safe sex” and are now teaching it to our children. Why should they or their students be punished for doing what is within their “sexual rights.”

Almost every state has implemented laws mandating that “safe sex” be taught to children from Kindergarten through 12th grade. Regardless of their supposed legal status as minors, children are being taught that “consensual” “safe sex” is the law of the land.

Anything goes as long as they want it!

How could any child feel safe in a school that promotes or turns a blind-eye to sexual activity?

What about the 1 in 4 girls and 1 in 6 boys who have been sexually abused in the US? Who are they supposed to turn to for help if the so-called “mandated reporters” in their school are supporting or condoning sexual activity with and among minors?

Does your child feel sexually safe at their school?

It seems that the safest place for a sexual predator is within the walls of your school. They have motive, opportunities to groom their victims, and access to your children.

We need to be just as vigilant about protecting our children from sexual influences and predators within our schools, as we are about protecting them from other dangerous behaviors.

Otherwise, there really are no ethical grounds for punishing them when they “sexually misbehave” at school.