Open letter to “Live-Tweet Mom”

By now, you have probably heard about the East Lansing, Michigan mother who sat in on abstinence day during her child’s sex ed course. Read here, and here.

She is touted as a “medical professor,” but apparently had plans other than to behave professionally. She violated school rules and live-tweeted her personal opinions about the content which have now gone viral.

Who did she tweet to? Who retweeted her tweets to make them go viral??

Following is an open letter to this mother:

Dear “Live-Tweet Mom,”

It is obvious that you had an agenda other than “concerned mother” when you visited your child’s sex ed class on abstinence day. What did you expect? I feel sad for your child, your partner, and your school district.

It is amazing that the “A” word was even used in a sex ed course! Abstinence is seldom used in Planned Parenthood/SIECUS type sex programs. When the term abstinence is used, it is usually redefined as “avoiding unprotected sex” and then this “new, progressive” definition is repeated a thousand times throughout the course to indoctrinate generations.

No one can verify the facts of this class, not even you. You weren’t there to listen. It was only one day. This is not an abstinence-only course, but an abstinence-only day.

You just outed the Sexual Rights Agenda that is so famous for saying that they do teach abstinence, but they want so-called “safe sex” taught, also. Really?

If an Abstinence Advocate sat in on a Planned Parenthood/SIECUS type sex class such as Making Proud Choices! or Be Proud! Be Responsible! and live-tweeted, do you think it would make national news and go viral?

Of course not!

No one would ever know about the sexual foreplay instructions for 11-13 year-olds showing them how to have “fun,” ”pleasurable,” “erotic,” oral, anal, and vaginal sex with condoms and extra lube. Is this age appropriate?

The Sexual Rights Network would continue to squash all media attempts to report medically accurate information that STDs such as HPV, Herpes, and Syphilis can be spread skin-to-skin, outside the protection of a condom. Holes in condoms are not required!

And, parents would never know that their daughters are trained to pleasure boys and help them regain erections. (Making Proud Choices! for middle schools.)

There would be no media outcry requiring that public schools stop teaching children how to have sex, which is not just a physical act, but involves the emotions and development of the adolescent brain. There would be no calls to protect our children’s brains from the pornography and “hands-on” skills taught in many sex classes today.

Teachers might still be fired or prosecuted for sexual liaisons with our children, but there would be no efforts to actually prevent the grooming of children and teens in our public schools, which sets them up for pregnancies, abortions, exploitation, human sex trafficking, prostitution, and the porn/sex industries.

The media blackout would enable Planned Parenthood, SIECUS, Kinsey Institute, and Advocates for Youth to continue their infrastructure building throughout all taxpayer institutions and the implementation of the National Sexuality Education Standards.

No. If a parent biased towards abstinence education were to live-tweet the pornographic content of today’s sex classes, nothing would happen.

What if schools had cameras in each sex class to provide live feeds and/or send the recordings to parents and taxpayers? Full disclosure and transparency!

Maybe then, parents – who have never known a day without sexual “freedom,” abortions, contraception, STDs, and chaotic family relationships – will also learn what is being taught to their child.

Maybe then, parents would realize that today’s sex ed is not about them. It is about their child’s future health, as well as their grandchildren’s likelihood of growing up in a home with their own parents who are emotionally and mentally capable of providing a safe and stable family environment for them.

This was obviously a setup and you received your moment of fame and fortune, but will your child? What about the other children in this school district?

What messages are they receiving from this fiasco?

Stop Planned Parenthood/SIECUS Sex Ed in South Carolina!

Stop_SignCitizens of South Carolina! Contact your House of Representative members on the Education Committee tell them to vote NO! on H3435.

NEXT TUESDAY, the Planned Parenthood/SIECUS Network (New Morning Foundation, Tell Them SC, Advocates for Youth, SC Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, ACLU and many others) are pushing the SC House Education Committee to    pass H3435, their so-called Healthy Youth Amendment.

It should be called the SC Sexual Foreplay Education Amendment!!

This Healthy Youth Amendment, which failed last year, is right out of the Planned Parenthood and SIECUS playbook. It will require that anyone teaching sex education in public schools be “certified” by the Planned Parenthood/SIECUS controlled powers of the state and federal government.

This means that sexual foreplay education programs like Making Proud Choices!, Making a Difference!, Safer Choices, Be Proud! Be Responsible!, and Teen Outreach Program will be the Law in every public school of the state.

All of these programs are found on the Planned Parenthood website!

Even if you do not have children in the public schools, your taxes are paying for these dangerous adolescent brain altering programs to be mandated statewide.

–If passed in its current form, H3435 will ultimately CENSOR programs that teach an abstinence-until-marriage message from having access to public middle and high school students.

–If passed in its current form, H3435 will PROMOTE Alfred Kinsey’s brand of “medically accurate” and “age appropriate” sex education which promotes consensual sexual activity among and with minors.

–If passed in its current form, H3435 will require that girls and boys be taught together and learn how to use condoms together.

–If passed in its current form, H3435 will make it virtually impossible for students in the public schools to learn about the benefits of abstinence until marriage, about the life skills to be successful at abstinence until marriage, and it will prevent them from learning about the benefits of MARRIAGE, AT ALL. Marriage has already been taken out of the SC Health Standards for public schools because it might offend someone!

This past Wednesday, Tell Them SC and the New Morning Foundation bombarded legislators with emails demanding that they pass H3435.

If you really care about the future of SC and the nation AND do not want your taxes being used to promote pornographic sex education to children and teens, under the guise of Comprehensive or so-called Safe Sex Education, then please contact your House Education Committee members by next Tuesday’s vote.

For more info on sexual foreplay ed programs CURRENTLY in your public schools: ExposeSexEdNow.com

SC Sexual Foreplay Education Act?

Joyce Fishman Klein
Joyce Fishman Klien, long time Safe Sex Advocate from Anderson, Greenville and Pickens County is promoting the SC Health Education Act, which should really be called the SC Sexual Foreplay Education Act.

A “new” Law, which failed last year, is being propose again by the New Morning Foundation, Tell Them SC and the SC Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. Reps. Skelton and Horne, both Republicans, are sponsoring the legislation again. They are all part of what we call the Planned Parenthood Network in SC and are outspoken advocates of Sexual Foreplay programs such as Making A Difference! and Making Proud Choices! for 11-13 year old minors, as well as Be Proud! Be Responsible!, Safer Choices and Teen Outreach Program for high school students.

For more details on these Sexual Foreplay programs, read Exposesexednow.com.

The SC Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy is the primary trainer of teachers for these programs, receiving millions of dollars from the Feds and SC state agencies. They do not teach any Evidence-based Abstinence-until-Marriage Programs.

This proposed Law would make it illegal for any Evidence-based Abstinence-Until-Marriage Education programs to be taught in any public schools.

Heritage Keepers® is the only Abstinence-Until-Marriage Education program in the nation that has been proven effective and approved as an evidence-based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program by US Health and Human Services. It is the only program, out of all programs, listed that complies with the Congressional definition for abstinence education.

A year after Heritage Keepers®, students participating in the program initiated sex at a rate 67% lower than students not receiving the program.

Since approval by US HHS, almost 2 years ago, Heritage Keepers®, has been targeted by the Planned Parenthood Networks, not only in SC, but throughout the nation. They say that Heritage Keepers® “cracked the Holy Grail” referring to their guarded US HHS list of programs that school districts and health departments use when selecting programs for their students.

Now that Heritage Keepers® is on that list, school districts and health departments across the nation are requesting it, rather than the sexual foreplay and abstinence-until-whenever… programs. They want their students to receive abstinence-until-marriage and benefits of marriage education as the first and strongest reproductive sexual health message.

Heritage Keepers® complies with the current SC Health Education Act, therefore the Planned Parenthood Network must change the Law to prevent Heritage Keepers® from receiving funding or access to students.

This is pure and blatant censorship. It is also the Planned Parenthood Networks’ strategy to completely take over sex education in our nation.

These attacks only validate that the Planned Parenthood Networks throughout America are denying the healthiest sexual health message for our children. If teens and young adults abstain until marriage, then the likelihood of ever having an abortion drops to 6%.

This would mean financial disaster for their industry since the demand for contraception, abortion and STD testing, and drugs from Big Pharma, would plummet!

The Planned Parenthood Networks are working in all states to pass and enforce laws that will mandate Sexual Foreplay-Only programs, thus eliminating the opportunity for students (minors) to ever hear a compelling abstinence-until-marriage message.

In America, it is only right for all students to have the opportunity to learn about the emotional, physical, financial, and familial benefits of abstinence and marriage. Otherwise, America can only look forward to more chaotic families being formed, more crushing entitlement programs, and more citizens dependent on an ever increasing and powerful government.

 

 

Is “Making A Difference!” telling a whopper?

Burger KingJust because a product says it’s a “burger”, a “cheese food”, “chocolatey” or a “meaty” dog food, does not mean that it has real beef, cheese, chocolate or meat in it. These are terms used to sell a product that may not meet the FDA’s definition for the products they  seek to imitate.

The same is true for many so-called abstinence education programs, billed as “abstinence-based”, an “abstinence approach”, or “abstinence-first”, when they have little abstinence content or behavioral results.

According to analysts at the Heritage Foundation, Making A Difference! and other such programs have at most 5% abstinence and 0% marriage promotion, but 95% other ingredients, such as safe sex, sexual foreplay, condoms and contraception/birth control education, condom negotiation skills, and promotion of alternative sexual practices (oral and anal sex) and uncommitted relationships, rather than life-long healthy marriages. A program that does not meet the Congressional definition of abstinence education, and contains questionable content and/or poor, if any, behavioral change towards increasing abstinent behaviors over a 12 month period, should not be allowed to call itself an abstinence education program.

It is not the real deal and many school districts, desperate for a program that will decrease teen sex, pregnancies and disease, are not getting what they hoped for.

Making A Difference!, states on its cover that it is an “Evidence-Based, Abstinence Approach to Teen Pregnancy, STD and HIV Prevention.” However, according to the evaluation on the US HHS website, Making A Difference! only delayed sex among its 11-13 year old virgin participants for 3 months and had no significant impact at 6 or 12 months after the program. For sexually active minors, it had no significant impact on the frequency of sexual intercourse, nor the correct/consistent use of condoms, nor even the use of condoms, at all. How is this program suppose to stop the spread of STD/HIV or reduce the rate of pregnancies?

It is the Planned Parenthood/SIECUS Networks, PhDs, great marketing by Select Media, and millions of dollars in federal funding that have created the illusion that Making A Difference! is a quality product, with positive behavioral outcomes.

Making A Difference! is not what it seems to be. And, taxpayer funds are being spent to indoctrinate 11-13 year old minors, who cannot legally consent to sex, into thinking that sex with or among their peers is normal and healthy. Making A Difference! in middle schools paves the way for students to receive even more sexually graphic programs like Making Proud Choices! and Be Proud! Be Responsible!, all written by the same PhDs, and published by their company, Select Media. Students will receive even more detailed, hands-on, instructions about sexual foreplay, making condoms fun and pleasurable, and how to use condoms and dental dams to “protect” themselves against STDs.

Check out the programs in your schools, find out if they are listed on the US HHS website, but then look up their outcomes and their own websites. Don’t be duped into “buying” a bogus, so-called abstinence program that is really teaching children how to engage in sexual activity.

Exposed: “Making A Difference!”

Making a Differnce

Making A Difference!, one of the sex education curricula in the news, out of Kansas and South Carolina, plainly states on its cover that it is an “Evidence-Based, Abstinence Approach to Teen Pregnancy, STD and HIV Prevention.”

The authors, Jemmott/Jemmott and their Select Media company, are responsible for this Sexual Foreplay curriculum, as well as, Making Proud Choices!, and Be Proud! Be Responsible!, in school districts across the nation.

The same sexually explicit content found on the Making A Difference! poster can be found in Module 2, pg. 65 of the Facilitator Manual, and similar verbiage is repeated on pg. 149, 150 in Making Proud Choices! and pg. 54 in Be Proud! Be Responsible!

Proponents of Making A Difference! defend its poster by saying that it’s content is taken out of context. So, let’s look at the context. The RATIONALE for this “brainstorming” lesson in Making A Difference! is in a sidebar on page 65 and states:

“Understanding that there are many behaviors that express sexual feelings help participants choose sexual behaviors that do not result in pregnancy or sexually transmitted infection.”

So, 11-13 year old minors are instructed to “choose sexual behaviors” and given a list of options to “brainstorm” about in class with mixed genders present. This lesson is all about introducing and normalizing sex acts to adolescents. As long as the risk of a pregnancy or STD is reduced, the sex act is OK. This is classic condom use and sexual foreplay instruction and it is found in most of the Jemmott/Jemmott and Select Media programs.

Where is the so-called “Abstinence Approach?” It appears to teach kids that, while abstinence is the best choice (disclaimer), PROTECTED SEX is just as safe when it comes to preventing pregnancy and disease.

Is this medically accurate, age appropriate instruction?

If this were in any other setting, there could be criminal charges against the perpetrators for sexual exploitation of minors. As it is, public school districts and their teachers are exempt when instructing your children about sexually explicit subjects under the guise of Pregnancy and STD Prevention.

These types of curricula play with your child’s mind and mold him/her towards sexual exploration. The content also labels mostly innocent behaviors as “sexual” so that the boundaries between nonsexual behaviors gets blurred with sexual foreplay behaviors.

Behaviors such as hugging, talking, saying “I like you,” dancing, holding hands, kissing, caressing, and massage are listed as “sexual behaviors” along with oral sex, sexual fantasy, anal sex, touching each others genitals, vaginal intercourse and grinding.

They are all on the same list.

Adolescents have a difficult time with boundaries, as it is. What are they to think when their teacher states that these innocent behaviors are also “sexual?” Why shouldn’t they “cross the line” into those other more exciting sexual behaviors?” After all, they are all listed as “sexual behaviors.”

Sex education in the schools has been out of bounds for decades and our culture is reflecting it. The Jemmotts, Select Media, and many other authors and publishing/distribution companies have made fortunes with federal CDC HIV funding contracts and by peddling their wares to school districts across the nation.

The federal government and the Planned Parenthood/SIECUS Networks continue to use your tax money to fund and approve these programs and to influence legislation to mandate them in all schools.

It is all about the money. The earlier an adolescent begins to have sex, the more sexual partners they will have, and the more sexual partners they have the more likely they will get pregnant and have an abortion.    It is all about the money.

No one cares about your children more than you do. Right? Sexual Climate and Peer Group are significant predictors of teen sexual activity. And, your school may be providing the perfect sexual climate (cesspool) and negative peer pressure to entice and seduce your child and their friends into engaging in sexual behaviors.

Now that you know, what will you do about it?

“Rights to Sex” TRUMP “Right to Life”

InALifeSafe Sex advocates say that humans should have the Right to Sex, but if that sexual encounter results in a pregnancy, that child does not have a Right to Life. Does any of this make sense to you? Sex is no longer the way that humans make babies or for marital intimacy, it is solely for hedonistic entertainment.

Safe Sex advocates support and teach many of the programs found on the Planned Parenthood and SIECUS websites. If pressed, their Networks claim that they DO teach abstinence in their programs. That they teach it at the beginning of every sex class!  Just before they teach minors that it is healthy and normal for kids their age to know how to sexually stimulate each others genitals.

Safe Sex-only programs like Making a Difference!, Making Proud Choices!, Pono Choices!, Be Proud! Be Responsible!, It’s Your Game, and Teen Outreach Program, are creating chaos, not only in AZ, CAHI, OH, OR, KS, MS, NC, ND, NY, SC, TN, TX, UT, but in the lives of our children and their families across the nation. Many of these programs have been in our schools for decades. However, under the Obama administration, they have been given unfettered access and funding, which is now increasing public exposure and scrutiny.

The basic premise of Safe Sex-only Education is that sexual activity, exploration and engagement is a Human Right from birth. (Reisman, Grossman) Sexual relationships are not to be controlled, but to be hotly pursued, because they are part of being human. In their minds, to do otherwise would hinder “healthy” human growth and development. Sex is a human right, and anything goes, at any age, with anyone, with anything, and with any gender. Whatever.

With this extreme Safe Sex ideology in mind, is it any wonder that proponents of Safe Sex for minors and school age teens, are lobbying state legislators to mandate Safe Sex-only education? And, they are demanding that taxpayers fund the government infrastructure, public school systems and universities that will further institutionalize it in our culture.

Is it any wonder that these same Safe Sex advocates view abstinence-until-marriage education programs as outdated, discriminatory, and a violation of the Sexual Rights every human should be entitled? This is why evidence-based abstinence-until-marriage programs, like Heritage Keepers®, are demonized and outlawed in many states.

Teaching kids to abstain from sexual activity, to wait until marriage, and to form their families within a life-long, mutually monogamous, faithful relationship, commonly known as marriage, is just ridiculous in their minds. Sex is considered a “sacred” Human Rights issue worthy of Laws and Regulations to protect it.

Unless parents and faith leaders stand up to stop this, our children and our nation are racing towards absolute chaos.

To postpone some of the chaos, Planned Parenthood and Obamacare have teamed up, again, to control any pesky pregnancies that might result from all of the Safe Sex being taught. This is why taxpayers are now forced to fund contraception, hormonal birth control, and abortions as yet, another  entitlement program.

But, hormones and abortion cannot stop STDs and HIV. In fact, there is evidence that hormonal birth control makes it easier for women to contract STDs! Other than abstinence, correct and consistent condom use is the only method that has been effective at reducing, but not eliminating, the transmission of HIV and some STDs. Even then, there is no way to measure correct and consistent condom use on a large scale. Therefore, there is no real way to prove, or disprove, whether a Safe Sex program really works, or not.

But that doesn’t matter, as long as access to students is not denied.

Sex education is no longer about teaching reproductive health so that teens understand their bodies. It is not really about teaching kids how to use contraception and birth control anymore, either. It is about how to reduce HIV/STDs by teaching kids how to have fun and pleasurable safe sex experiences while using condoms and dental dams. Otherwise, the masses (our children and grandchildren) that they say must be taught about their Sexual Rights, will not use condoms to keep HIV/STDs under control.

What about the STDs that condoms are less effective at preventing, like HPV, Herpes, and Syphilis? Those are considered normal, acceptable risks. Besides, more government entitlements are available through Big Pharma for the HPV vaccine, Herpes drugs and antibiotics. Forget the cervical cancer and the infertility that results from these normal STDs.

If we the people, do not stop this madness, then America is over. There has never been a culture that thrived under these circumstances. They have all fallen and disappeared.

It only takes one person in each school district, community, state, or church to stand up and expose the Safe Sex agenda. Even normal liberals do not want their children exposed to this kind of pornographic indoctrination.

Most of us are in denial or blind, until we see it for ourselves. Find out what is in your child’s school. Show it to other parents. Read it out loud to elected officials.

Ask them if this is good enough for their children and their friends.

 

Real Sex Ed Debate: “Contraception” is Sexual Foreplay

Featured

Stop_SignYear 2014 will usher in new Sex Ed Laws in many states, requiring that “contraception” be taught in middle and high school. But, is it “contraception” or sexual foreplay?

Most mandated Sex Ed today reads more like steamy sex therapy sessions than teen pregnancy and STD prevention education. Under the guise of “safe sex,” many curricula teach that as long as condoms are used, consensual sex is the “new standard” for sexual activity, not marriage.  

Sex Ed curricula, such as Making A Difference!, Making Proud Choices!, Be Proud! Be Responsible!, Safer Choices, Teen Outreach Program (TOP), Wise Guys! and others can be found on the Planned Parenthood and SIECUS websites. They have very little verbiage, if any, about the benefits of abstaining from sexual activity and do not mention marriage as the ideal context for sexual activity.

Consensual sex is the “new norm.”

These curricula teach students how to engage in “safe” sexual foreplay including oral sex and intercourse, how to experience the pleasures of sex, and about ways to eroticize sex, all while purportedly teaching condom skills to prevent STD transmission. 

Sex, and more sex, is the goal and “safety” is the Trojan Horse.

The problem is, sex outside of marriage can never be as safe as sex within a healthy, faithful marriage. This vital message is being censored from our teens.

The current Sex Ed debate is no longer about whether to teach Abstinence or Contraception. It is about whether to explain about methods of “contraception” or to teach “hands on” sexual foreplay skills under the guise of “contraception” education. 

Unlike Abstinence-until-Marriage education, so-called “Safer Sex” programs are not strictly regulated by the federal government. They are given free rein to teach anything they can get away with.

“Safer Sex” programs are designed to make teens feel “proud,” “responsible,” and more comfortable about having consensual sex as long as they use condoms or dental dams. But, are “Safe Sex” programs safe? Unfortunately, many STDs, such as HPV, Herpes, and Syphilis are transmitted outside of the “protection” of condoms and dental dams. And, since condoms cannot be used unless the male is sexually stimulated, it is reasonable to think that there is a lot of skin-to-skin (STD transmission) contact prior to using a condom or dental dam.

Do “Safe Sex” programs delay sex initiation, as they claim? Under the influence of sexual stimulation, it is counter intuitive to expect sex to be delayed and for condoms to be used correctly and consistently even by adults, much less impulsive teens.

The most respected researcher in the field of teen sexual activity is Stan Weed, PhD of the Institute for Research and Evaluation. Weed’s report on Teen Pregnancy Prevention programs in 2010 revealed that very few “Safe Sex” condom programs were effective at increasing abstinence or condom use for any length of time. In “Federally Funded Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs: Not What They Claim to Be.”, Weed states that out of 28 programs approved in 2010,

“Only 2 TPP [Teen Pregnancy Prevention] programs demonstrated the ability to increase adolescents’ rate of consistent condom use for at least one year. Neither was a school-based program.”

Weed’s critique also calls out these TPP programs for their sexually explicit content, teaching “safe” alternative sexual behaviors (sexual foreplay), and that “Abstaining from sex is not a primary focus in the majority of TPP programs.”

Parents and elected officials need to study the Sex Ed Laws of their state, as well as all Sex Ed curricula approved under that Law. Afterwards, they may want to provide their own reading lessons for Legislators and School Board members.

In preparation, consider the following questions and decide whether instruction is being required or if, by default, “Safe(r) Sex” is allowed to slip in through the loopholes.

1.  Does your state’s Sex Ed Law include verbiage requiring the teaching of  “contraception” and/or “Safer Sex” for middle and high schools?

  • Does the Law define “contraception” or is “contraception” used broadly to include “birth control” hormones (Plan B, Emergency Contraception) and devices (Emergency IUDs) along with referrals to Planned Parenthood/Family Planning Clinics?
  • Does the Law define “Safe(r) Sex?”
  • Does the Law require that approved Sex Ed programs fulfill the Pregnancy Prevention Education and Reproductive Education requirements to be used in the schools? Programs like Making a Difference! and Making Proud Choices! do not fulfill all requirements of most state laws for Pregnancy Prevention or Reproductive Education, therefore other programs must be supplemented.

2. Does your Sex Ed Law include any verbiage requiring the teaching of sexual foreplay techniques including the use of dental dams for oral sex, eroticizing condom use with lubricants and detailed instructions for regaining erections? If not, is there any language to prevent such teaching?

3. Does your Sex Ed Law include any verbiage requiring teachers to use visual imagery or sexual fantasies to help students pretend they are somewhere else, or the opposite gender, or with someone else while engaging in sexual activity? Wouldn’t this require a license to practice psychotherapy in the classroom?

4. Does your Sex Ed Law require that abstinence until marriage be taught as the standard for all school age students? Does it loosely define abstinence, which allows “safe sex” curricula to claim that they are  abstinence-based or abstinence-first? If marriage is omitted as a cultural norm from the Law and also from the approved Sex Ed curricula, then there are no boundaries for sexual activity.

5. Who is in charge of making sure that all approved Sex Ed curricula comply with the state Sex Ed Law? Unaccountable bureaucrats?

6. Are there any approved Sex Ed curricula that have “Safe(r) Sex” in their title, on their cover, or part of their content? THIS IS A RED FLAG!

7. Are all approved Sex Ed curricula used in the schools the original evidence-based version evaluated for program effectiveness and listed on the US HHS website? Or, are they “adaptations” of the approved curricula, in order to gain approval? 

8. What are the behavioral outcomes for each approved Sex Ed curriculum used in your state?

  • Is each approved Sex Ed curriculum listed on the US HHS website as being proven effective and evidence-based for Teen Pregnancy Prevention?
    • If the curriculum is an abstinence-until-marriage program, does it significantly increase abstinent behaviors among participants, compared with non-program participants, as measured a year after the program?
    • If the curriculum is an abstinence-based “safer sex” program, does it significantly increase abstinent behaviors among participants, compared with non-program participants, as measured a year after the program?
    • If the curriculum is a “Safe Sex” condom program, does it significantly increase correct and consistent condom use for sexually active students, compared with sexually active non-program participants, as measured a year after the program?

9. Who trains the educators to teach approved Sex Ed curricula in your state?

10. Are there any abstinence-until-marriage curricula approved in your state/district that are listed on the US HHS website as being proven effective and evidence-based for Teen Pregnancy Prevention? If not, why not?

Getting answers to all of these questions will provide a much clearer picture of the sexual climate in your school, school district and state. Our schools should be promoting behaviors that are conducive to learning and achieving academic success. If this is not the case, then much work needs to be done quickly to protect children from sexual influences that can derail their futures.

Get busy!