Opt Out of Reducing the Risk!

Featured

Mary S. McLellan, MS, SRAS      ~      Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist

Will your child take Reducing the Risk this year in sex education? Parents, beware of this Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) program. Reducing the Risk claims to protect students, but it grooms them to engage in risky sexual activity!

Reducing the Risk says that it’s an abstinence-based program, but it redefines abstinence to mean “choosing not to do any sexual activity that carries a risk for pregnancy or STD/HIV.” This completely made-up definition for abstinence means that as long as condoms and/or contraception are used and fluids are not exchanged, any type of sexual activity is acceptable and considered ‘safe!’

Family Watch International has developed “The CSE Harmful Elements Analysis Tool,” which includes 15 Harmful Elements typically found in CSE. Each program analyzed is scored based on actual harmful content from the curriculum, including workbooks, videos, and facilitator materials. So, what about Reducing the Risk?

Reducing the Risk (5th Edition) contains 15/15 of the harmful elements typically found in CSE curricula or materials. Reducing the Risk, and therefore anyone who teaches it, grooms children to engage in sexual activity that can have life-long consequences.

Reducing the Risk not only normalizes child sex, it teaches them how to consent to sex through role plays. Anal, oral and vaginal sex are promoted as long as condoms are used. Homosexual/bisexual behaviors and the child’s right to experience sexual pleasure are all a part of Reducing the Risk. Explicit details about orgasm for both boys and girls are described. Students are taught that even mutual masturbation is a harmless activity for children to engage.

Reducing the Risk goes far beyond condom demonstrations to teach students how to make using condoms fun, exciting, and romantic. The goal of Reducing the Risk is to avoid unprotected sex and DON’T GET PREGNANT! As long as a condom is used and fluids are not exchanged any type of sex at any age is acceptable. Also, students are assigned to “locate clinics” and to learn about their services, condoms, and other forms of contraception to “decide which method(s) might be best for them.”

Throughout Reducing the Risk, students are not given the option to return to an abstinent lifestyle, but simply to “avoid unprotected sex.” Teachers are also trained to be inclusive, to affirm transgender ideology and sexual orientation through role plays and group discussions. Anything goes!

Not surprising, Reducing the Risk undermines parental rights by denigrating traditional values. The program encourages students to decide for themselves when they are ready for sex. Children are told that they do not need their parent’s permission to get contraception or to be tested for STDs/HIV. They’re encouraged to take their boyfriends or girlfriends with them to family planning clinics. Parents are completely irrelevant!

Maybe this kind of content doesn’t bother you. But, don’t you think federally funded CSE programs should at least be proven effective at protecting your child’s sexual health? Reducing the Risk fails to protect students from life-long consequences of sexual activity.

Research findings released in 2018 on Reducing the Risk revealed that while students learned a lot about sex, that knowledge did not translate into reducing sexual activity, reducing sexual intercourse without protection, and it did not reduce pregnancies. “The program had no effects on refusal skills or intentions for future sexual behavior at either time point.”  Yet, Reducing the Risk is still funded with your tax dollars and taught in half of U.S. states!

Parents, OPT OUT of Reducing the Risk while you still can! California has already mandated that parents cannot OPT OUT their students. They must take CSE programs like Reducing the Risk regardless of content or effectiveness.

Your child deserves better sexual health education than Reducing the Risk! Demand it!

The Protect Child Health Coalition (PCHC), a project of Family Watch International, is  a national coalition of parents and professionals. PCHC exists to provide you with the information, tools and resources you need to protect your children.

FRUSTRATED PARENTS TURN TO GRASSROOTS SEX ED SIT OUT

Featured

CHARLOTTE, NC – APRIL 23, 2018 – PRESS RELEASE –

A grassroots movement of frustrated public school parents who want to end the sexualization of their children during class time has turned their frustration to action with a “Sex Ed Sit Out” protest on April 23rd.

The protest, launched by a few moms on social media who were troubled by the graphic nature of current sex education resources in schools, has grown into a global movement with protests being held in multiple U.S. cities and also Australia and the UK.

Parents are demanding to know why their children are being taught how to have anal and oral sex, masturbate one another, and question one’s gender. Caryl Ayala, a former public school teacher and organizer of the Austin, Texas, protest, said, “We are uniting with parents across the globe to demand that our rights as parents be respected regarding the teaching of sexuality and sexual orientation. Hands off our kids!”

Cities such as Rocklin, CA and Fairfax County, VA have recently been the focus of news headlines because of controversial, gender-bending and graphic sex education and anti-bullying programs which parents say they were not informed would be taught to their children, sometimes as young as five-years-old. “

“Why are our tax dollars going to pay for curriculums and resources that teach dangerous and promiscuous behaviors which most parents find morally abhorrent and the CDC has stated are a health risk?” questioned Elizabeth Johnston, viral activist blogger and concerned mother.

“Furthermore, why aren’t administrators being transparent with parents about the content of sexuality resources? It’s as if they have something to hide. That should frighten parents everywhere.”

Education Chairman of the Indiana Liberty Coalition and one of the protest organizers, Rhonda Miller, stated,

“Follow the money. Comprehensive sex ed is being rolled out across America, often sponsored by special interest LGBT groups like Human Rights Campaign, and disguised as anti-bullying programs. If it’s not okay for special interest groups like the NRA to be buying classroom time to push their agenda, then how is it okay for HRC monies to be buying schools off to teach gender-bending ideology and anal sex tutorials?”

On April 23rd, parents around the nation will be pulling their children out of school for the day in protest of dangerous and graphic sex education and uniting at various locations to hold press events and field media questions.

For more information about the Sex Ed Sit Out in your area, visit www.SexEdSitOut.com or contact:

Elizabeth Johnston

ActivistMommyOfficial@gmail.com

(740) 973-0542

Consider the $ource!

Featured

Mary S. McLellan, MS, SRAS ~ Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist

Sexperts continue to spout ideology rather than medically accurate facts and age appropriate information. They scare parents, teachers, and even faith leaders into believing that every child, adolescent, and teen is going to have sex and that there’s nothing they can do about it.

 

All, while the CDC reports dramatic decreases in sexually active teens! If Sexperts really believed that teaching kids to abstain is futile:

  • Why sneak their sex programs into school districts under the guise of abstinence education?
  • Why claim to teach abstinence when they clearly don’t know how to do it?
  • Why grab government funding that is only meant for teaching kids the skills NOT TO HAVE SEX, and use it to normalize sexual activity?
  • Why be so deceitful about the content of Comprehensive Sex Ed programs if they are really so much better for kids?

John Santelli, Planned Parenthood’s golden-boy, and Leslie Kantor, VP of Education at Planned Parenthood Federation of America, are prolific “researchers” on the abstinence or Sexual Risk Avoidance (SRA) approach to public health. They even claim to have no conflict of interest when reporting about the so-called failures of abstinence education.

Who are they kidding?  Sexualizing innocent children, encouraging minors to explore their sexuality, dispensing contraception, and then treating STDs and aborting babies is their bread-and-butter! It’s all about the money!

Santelli and Kantor’s most recent hit-piece, Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage: An Updated Review of U.S. Policies, denigrates programs that seek to protect the health and innocence of minors. Their article is basically a rehash of one published in 2006. Other contributors include other Sexual Rights Activists from the Guttmacher Institute, Columbia University, Planned Parenthood, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, and Indiana University – home of the Kinsey Institute! They are all known antagonists to abstinence or SRA education.

Among many assertions, the authors contend that there is a fundamental right to be taught everything there is to know about human sexuality and sexual pleasure. They complain that: “The US federal approach to abstinence promotion raises serious ethical and human rights concerns. Access to complete and accurate STI, HIV/AIDS, and reproductive and sexual health information has been recognized as a basic human right and essential to realizing the human right to the highest attainable standard of health.”

Really? For minors?

And, who is it that recognizes “reproductive and sexual health information” is a “basic human right?”  Sexual Rights Activists, of course, and especially those operating through the United Nations. However, none of their so-called “human rights” are binding on US public health policies or US parental rights.

These so called “rights” are completely fabricated to promote the Sexual Rights agenda. Family Watch International has fought the Sexual Rights Agenda at the United Nations for decades. Family Watch supports the family and parental rights to protect their children from sexual exploitation. To find out more, watch The War on Children: The Comprehensive Sexuality Education Agenda.

We believe that minor children, including teens, have the legal and human right to be protected from anyone that would harm them physically, emotionally, or psychologically. Therefore, it is beyond obscene to expose them to sexually explicit information.

Who are these “researchers?” They are depraved activist who seek every opportunity to sexually exploit innocent children for their own financial gain.

Comprehensive Sex Ed: Total Waste of Our Money!

Featured

By Mary S McLellan, SRAS (Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist)

Do you ever wonder why our culture is more sexualized and pornified than eight years ago?

Nearly a BILLION DOLLAR$ of our money was funneled to Comprehensive Sexuality Education under the Obama administration. 


Comprehensive Sexuality Education is not about science, biology, or reproduction. It is about teaching minor children the pleasures of sex, Sexual Rights, and that sexual risks are no big deal. 

Most so-called Comprehensive Sexuality Education downplays STDs and solves every pregnancy with abortion. It is total indoctrination into a hedonistic lifestyle. Maybe that’s why condom use has flat-lined for twenty-years! (CDC YRBS)

Using terms like “medically accurate” and “age appropriate” are red flags when defined by Planned Parenthood, Advocates For Youth, or Obama’s complicit media. 

Today’s “Comprehensive” Sexuality Education leaves out the many benefits of and skills needed to delay sex until one is educated, self-sufficient, and ready to form a healthy family. That’s not comprehensive enough for most parents and grandparents, who want only quality education for their children. 

We need to defund Obama’s Sexual Rights Agenda so that America’s children can thrive and enjoy the freedoms they deserve. 

Learn more: StopCSE.org and WeAscend.org