Opt Out of Reducing the Risk!

Featured

Mary S. McLellan, MS, SRAS      ~      Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist

Will your child take Reducing the Risk this year in sex education? Parents, beware of this Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) program. Reducing the Risk claims to protect students, but it grooms them to engage in risky sexual activity!

Reducing the Risk says that it’s an abstinence-based program, but it redefines abstinence to mean “choosing not to do any sexual activity that carries a risk for pregnancy or STD/HIV.” This completely made-up definition for abstinence means that as long as condoms and/or contraception are used and fluids are not exchanged, any type of sexual activity is acceptable and considered ‘safe!’

Family Watch International has developed “The CSE Harmful Elements Analysis Tool,” which includes 15 Harmful Elements typically found in CSE. Each program analyzed is scored based on actual harmful content from the curriculum, including workbooks, videos, and facilitator materials. So, what about Reducing the Risk?

Reducing the Risk (5th Edition) contains 15/15 of the harmful elements typically found in CSE curricula or materials. Reducing the Risk, and therefore anyone who teaches it, grooms children to engage in sexual activity that can have life-long consequences.

Reducing the Risk not only normalizes child sex, it teaches them how to consent to sex through role plays. Anal, oral and vaginal sex are promoted as long as condoms are used. Homosexual/bisexual behaviors and the child’s right to experience sexual pleasure are all a part of Reducing the Risk. Explicit details about orgasm for both boys and girls are described. Students are taught that even mutual masturbation is a harmless activity for children to engage.

Reducing the Risk goes far beyond condom demonstrations to teach students how to make using condoms fun, exciting, and romantic. The goal of Reducing the Risk is to avoid unprotected sex and DON’T GET PREGNANT! As long as a condom is used and fluids are not exchanged any type of sex at any age is acceptable. Also, students are assigned to “locate clinics” and to learn about their services, condoms, and other forms of contraception to “decide which method(s) might be best for them.”

Throughout Reducing the Risk, students are not given the option to return to an abstinent lifestyle, but simply to “avoid unprotected sex.” Teachers are also trained to be inclusive, to affirm transgender ideology and sexual orientation through role plays and group discussions. Anything goes!

Not surprising, Reducing the Risk undermines parental rights by denigrating traditional values. The program encourages students to decide for themselves when they are ready for sex. Children are told that they do not need their parent’s permission to get contraception or to be tested for STDs/HIV. They’re encouraged to take their boyfriends or girlfriends with them to family planning clinics. Parents are completely irrelevant!

Maybe this kind of content doesn’t bother you. But, don’t you think federally funded CSE programs should at least be proven effective at protecting your child’s sexual health? Reducing the Risk fails to protect students from life-long consequences of sexual activity.

Research findings released in 2018 on Reducing the Risk revealed that while students learned a lot about sex, that knowledge did not translate into reducing sexual activity, reducing sexual intercourse without protection, and it did not reduce pregnancies. “The program had no effects on refusal skills or intentions for future sexual behavior at either time point.”  Yet, Reducing the Risk is still funded with your tax dollars and taught in half of U.S. states!

Parents, OPT OUT of Reducing the Risk while you still can! California has already mandated that parents cannot OPT OUT their students. They must take CSE programs like Reducing the Risk regardless of content or effectiveness.

Your child deserves better sexual health education than Reducing the Risk! Demand it!

The Protect Child Health Coalition (PCHC), a project of Family Watch International, is  a national coalition of parents and professionals. PCHC exists to provide you with the information, tools and resources you need to protect your children.

Take a Stand! Join the Sex Ed Sit Out!

Featured

Sharing info from David Cooke and Citizen Go.

Hands off our kids!

Don’t Sexualize Our Kids!

We, as concerned parents and community members, are sick of the sexualization of our children! We say NO to graphic, gender-bending, promiscuity-promoting sex education for our kids.

We demand that public schools stop treating our children like guinea pigs in some social engineering experiment. We demand that schools respect parents’ values and parents’ authority.

We will not stand for our tax money being used to promote sexual liberation, deviance, and gender confusion to our precious kids. In protest, we stand together with those parents pulling their children out of public school on April 23rd for the sex ed sit out.

SIGN NOW

Dear Mary,

In less than one week, the “Sex Ed Sit Out”will take place in cities across the US, Canada, and Australia.

Parents are fed up with the sexual education (indoctrination) their children are receiving in our public school system. They want their kids to learn the three Rs, not the LGBTQIAs. They are tired of their hard-earned tax dollars going to pay for programs and policies that blatantly contradict their family’s values and beliefs.

That’s why parents will be pulling their kids out of public schools across the globe onMonday, April 23rd, 2018. They are protesting graphic, gender-bending, promiscuity-promoting sex education for our kids.

Show your support and sign the petition: http://www.citizengo.org/en/fm/160082-fed-parents-plan-sex-ed-sit-out

This protest was initiated by a group of moms on social media. These are moms who love and care for their kids. They want them to learn respect, decency, and virtue. They do not think they should be learning how to have anal and oral sex, masturbate one another, or change genders. These are just some of the perverse practices being promoted in so-called “comprehensive sexuality education” (CSE).

I fought hard against CSE at the United Nations last month, along with a team of international CitizenGO campaigners. UN-based CSE programs encourage immoral behaviour and dangerous experimentation while downplaying abstinence and omitting purity. I am so encouraged to see this grassroots “Sex Ed Sit Out” effort growing and expanding to address CSE on the local level – where our kids are most impacted.

Elizabeth Johnston (“Activist Mommy“), one of the founding moms, is quoted in Newsweek as saying, “This is a sit out everyone can support and that we should be supporting. If you are not a rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth leftist liberal who wants to pervert the minds of children, everyone should be able to support [it].”

Sign now: http://www.citizengo.org/en/fm/160082-fed-parents-plan-sex-ed-sit-out

To date, official protests are planned for twelve cities:

  • Austin, Texas
  • Bloomington, Indiana
  • Charlotte, North Carolina
  • Decorah, Iowa
  • Garden Grove, California
  • Martinsburg, West Virginia
  • Sacramento, California
  • San Antonio, Texas
  • Spokane, Washington
  • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
  • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia

More details area available on the Sex Ed Sit Out web site and Facebook page.

Whether you are a parent or not, please join us by signing our petition to say NOto graphic, immoral sex education for children! And if you are able to come out in person, join the “Sex Ed Sit Out” protest next Monday, April 23rd at one of the locations above – or start a protest in your own town.

Sincerely Yours,

David Cooke and the entire CitizenGO Team

Sign and share the petition: http://www.citizengo.org/en/fm/160082-fed-parents-plan-sex-ed-sit-out

P.S. Our children are our future. We all need to be concerned about who’s filling their minds with what. Please sign and share the petition today to help make our voices heard. God Bless.

Condom Failure in South Carolina

Featured

Mary S. McLellan, MS, SRAS   ~  Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist

Robert Swain MS HIA

 

Health experts in South Carolina (SC) are finally showing concern about the high rates of STDs/HIV among teens. According to GoUpstate.com,

In one-year, the rate of HIV/AIDS jumped 11% among 15-19 year olds.

And, SC ranks in the top ten states for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and HIV/AIDS.

This data is surprising since HIV/AIDS rates are generally reported as declining. What are we to think? 

Regardless of its validity, you should know that the “health experts” mentioned in this article are members of the National Coalition to Support Sexuality Education, a coalition run by SIECUS, which is a spin-off of Planned Parenthood. They are in league with over three hundred national Sexperts who promote Sexual Rights in our schools under the guise of Comprehensive Sexuality Education. (CSE).

Teaching students to delay sex until their brains are mature and they are self-sufficient adults is the best sexual health message, regardless of their sexual history or sexual orientation. However, that is not a Sexpert’s primary goal. Delaying sex just does not fit the Sexual Rights narrative, nor the sex industries’ lucrative business model. They want to get kids hooked on sex at an early age so that they become lifelong customers.

Sexual Rights advocates cannot admit that CSE or ‘contraception-only sex ed’ fails to protect our children from the consequences of sex, mainly STDs/HIV. Rather, they shift the blame to a lack of “access to health care services and affordability of health care services.” Really? Using vulnerable minors to politicize the STD/HIV crisis in SC is absolutely shameless. And for what? More condom distribution centers!

The problem is not health services; it is CSE in our schools. CSE is neither comprehensive nor educational. It is Sexual Rights indoctrination that normalizes and promotes sexual activity for minors. Students are legal minors and cannot consent to sex, so why are adults teaching them how to have sex?

Besides, many SC high school students are not even using condoms. GoUpstate.com reports that, “Only 59 percent of [sexually active] high school students report (2015) using a condom the last time they had sex.” This data does not even factor whether the condoms were used correctly or consistently.

If 59 percent were the only relative data point, this might sounds OK. But, the report neglects to inform us that condom use in SC peaked in 2005 at 67 percent and it has been in decline ever since! Most of this decline occurred during the Obama years when sexually explicit, pornographic, CSE programs began receiving more than 90 percent of all federal sex ed funding. Teaching kids the pleasures of sex and expecting them to care about their future health is ludicrous.

And, for those 41 percent that used a condom the last time they had sex, condoms are not protective enough. Exaggerating condom effectiveness or allowing students to believe that condoms will protect them from STDs is deceitful. Such medically inaccurate information gives students false assurance that they are protected and it encourages them to take more risks.

In addition to failed condom education, we reported last fall that a U.S. Health and Human Services replication study of  “evidence-based” CSE programs reveals that most were ineffective. The full review is in the American Journal of Public Health (October 2016). One of their conclusions was,

“While several of the evaluations did show positive outcomes, most of the programs had small or insignificant impacts on adolescent behavior.”

Valerie Huber, Founder/CEO of WeAscend.org, a national Sexual Risk Avoidance (SRA) policy organization, nailed it in her summary of the findings:

“Compared with their peers who were in the program, teens in some TPP-funded projects were more likely to begin having sex, more likely to engage in oral sex, and more likely to get pregnant. In fact, more than 80% of students in these programs fared either worse or no better than their peers who were not in the program.”

Those ignoring the devastating results of CSE programs are not competent to teach our children. To date, none of the failed CSE programs have been pulled from SC schools. Parents and taxpayers must demand that they be removed and replaced with proven-effective Sexual Risk Avoidance programs.

If CSE programs were seat belts, they would have been recalled years ago!

Comprehensive Sex Ed: Total Waste of Our Money!

Featured

By Mary S McLellan, SRAS (Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist)

Do you ever wonder why our culture is more sexualized and pornified than eight years ago?

Nearly a BILLION DOLLAR$ of our money was funneled to Comprehensive Sexuality Education under the Obama administration. 


Comprehensive Sexuality Education is not about science, biology, or reproduction. It is about teaching minor children the pleasures of sex, Sexual Rights, and that sexual risks are no big deal. 

Most so-called Comprehensive Sexuality Education downplays STDs and solves every pregnancy with abortion. It is total indoctrination into a hedonistic lifestyle. Maybe that’s why condom use has flat-lined for twenty-years! (CDC YRBS)

Using terms like “medically accurate” and “age appropriate” are red flags when defined by Planned Parenthood, Advocates For Youth, or Obama’s complicit media. 

Today’s “Comprehensive” Sexuality Education leaves out the many benefits of and skills needed to delay sex until one is educated, self-sufficient, and ready to form a healthy family. That’s not comprehensive enough for most parents and grandparents, who want only quality education for their children. 

We need to defund Obama’s Sexual Rights Agenda so that America’s children can thrive and enjoy the freedoms they deserve. 

Learn more: StopCSE.org and WeAscend.org

RECALL: “Making A Difference!”

Featured

by Mary S. McLellan, MS, SRAS ~ Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist

massive-recall-for-takata-airbags1-791x445 Would you let your child’s life depend on an unreliable product that claims to only Reduce the Risks of harm? READ the research on “Making A Difference!” before you allow your child to take this course in middle school.

 

Back in 1998, the research design for “Making A Difference!” was considered strong and still, those results from a single study showed that the program only delayed sex for 3 months, in a small sample of 11-13 year old African American urban students, who – had NOT had sex.

However, at the 6 and 12 month evaluation, there was no impact on sexual initiation, sex, condom use, or unprotected sex. NO IMPACT!

“The study found that three months after the program ended, adolescents participating in the intervention who were sexually inexperienced at baseline were significantly less likely to report having had sexual intercourse in the previous 3 months. The study did not find any statistically significant program impacts on rates of sexual intercourse for adolescents who were sexually experienced at baseline, or on frequency of sexual intercourse, condom use, or unprotected sexual intercourse for the full sample. The study found no statistically significant program impacts for the follow-ups conducted six and 12 months after the program ended.”

This 18 year old program had only been evaluated ONCE; there were no replication studies to show that the same thing could happen again. (This is shoddy research.) Why was it deemed an Evidence-based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program and put on the US Health and Human Services’ and CDC’s list to push in public schools?

“Making A Difference!” has been promoted in public schools for eighteen years!

“Making A Difference!” has NEVER been officially evaluated in a school setting, but only in after-school and community settings (poor inner city minorities.) YET, it is widely used to teach all minors in school settings. Again, shoddy research and application!

“Making A Difference!” is touted as an “abstinence education program,” but uses the term “abstinence-approach” to fool school districts into thinking they have a proven effective abstinence education program.

An authentic Evidence-based Abstinence/Sexual Risk Avoidance Education program sets clear boundaries to avoid all sexual activity. Boundaries such as commitment, monogamy, and marriage. However, “Making A Difference!” does not set boundaries for how long the minor child is to delay sex. They teach…When you feel ready for sex. That could be today – right after school, this weekend, prom night, etc.

“”Making A Difference!” is an Abstinence Approach to Prevention of STDs, HIV and Teen Pregnancy is an eight module curriculum that provides young adolescents with the knowledge, confidence, and skills necessary to reduce their risk of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), HIV, and pregnancy by abstaining from sex. The curriculum is designed for middle school youth and is delivered by trained facilitators.”

“Making A Difference” is written by the Jemmotts, the same authors who wrote “Making Proud Choices!” and “Be Proud! Be Responsible.” They used a Sexual Risk Reduction approach, rather than a Sexual Risk Avoidance approach. Several of the Jemmott sex programs are advocated by Planned Parenthood, SIECUS, and other Sexual Rights Groups.

Sexual Risk Reduction means that as long as “protection” is used (condoms, birth control, alternative sex) then sex can be safe. Really? Is this what minors, who legally cannot consent to sex, need to hear? How has that been working for us over the past 20 years?

For more information, check out other articles on these programs at ExposeSexEdNow.com.

The Sexual Rights Cash Cow

Featured

by Mary S. McLellan, MS, SRAS ~ Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist

 

cow-cashHave you ever felt queasy about those sex programs in your child’s school or health clinic? Maybe you feel that your child is too young to know about oral, anal, and vaginal sex, and how lube can make sex more fun…but you say nothing.

Besides, all of the other parents are letting strangers teach their children about sex, so why shouldn’t you?

Or, maybe you caved, because Educrats and Sexperts have convinced you that they know better than you what is best for your child?

Your gut is right and you should have trusted it! Some of the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs promoted and funded with your tax dollars were re-evaluated over the past five years and FAILED miserably. Buried in the HHS website is the evidence that these programs fared no better than general health classes at reducing teen sex or increasing condom use. In fact, some of the programs increased teen sex and pregnancies!

Thanks to Ascend CEO Valerie Huber, these evaluations released in July 2016 are exposed in this press release. Ascend is the only credentialing organization in the U.S. that trains professionals in Sexual Risk Avoidance (SRA), a public health model for optimal ascend-infographic-on-csesexual health. You can read more in Obama’s promiscuous sex-ed program a failure. Also, click on the Infographic (right) for a quick look or here for a more detailed summary of the findings.

Parents must find out if these failed Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) programs are still in their schools and community organizations: Carrera Program (Children’s Aid Society), Cuidate, It’s Your Game: Keep It Real, PHAT! Abstinence-Only Intervention (Promoting Health Among Teens), Reducing the Risk, Safer Sex, Seventeen Days, Teen Outreach Program, and BART (Becoming A Responsible Teen).

We need a massive recall of these programs!

Don’t be duped by so-called “adaptations” of old or failed programs. Adaptations are simply a slick move by HHS to revamp the same failed sex programs without evaluating them. If the core is rotten, the entire product is disgusting!

While, most of the HHS Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs are a scam, there is one exception. Heritage Keepers® Abstinence Education is the only authentic Sexual Risk Avoidance program that has been proven effective at increasing abstinence among teens. Heritage Keepers® promotes abstinence-outside-of-marriage. After one year, Heritage Keepers® students initiated sexual activity at a rate that is 67% lower than students not receiving the program.

Today, we have generations of indoctrinated millennials and those younger who think that aberrant sexual lifestyles are the norm. They have been taught that everyone, regardless of age, has the right to sex, as long as they have consent.

Really? Sexual predators groom their victims to consent to sex.

American parents must wake up. You have been used and abused by the Sexual Rights Agenda. You are their Cash Cow. They have taken your money, your children, and your marriages.

Now, they want to take away your future.

 

Just like Jewish lives…Black Lives DO Matter!

Featured

Tim ScottDid Jewish lives matter during World War II? Yes, and there was no quibbling about it. Jewish people were targeted by the Nazis for extinction and Christians, like Corrie Ten Boom with others in the Holland Underground, sacrificed their lives to save them.

Why are we whining about whether Black Lives Matter or All Lives Matter? It’s petty in the midst of the violence on our streets, deliberate slaughter of unborn Black babies, and fatherless children.

The Black family in America has been systematically under assault since the time of slavery, and especially since Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, designed ways to control Black populations. Along with Adolph Hitler, Sanger collaborated in eugenics to develop a pure race by getting rid of populations that, in their opinion, were unfit. Hitler targeted the Jews and Sanger targeted the “Negroes.” Both, also targeted the mentally deficient so that they would not be a burden on social services.

Margaret Sanger is quoted saying, “We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities.  The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

According to Dr. Paul Kenger, “Margaret Sanger spoke to a women’s organization affiliated with the KKK and she started the Negro Project to bring birth-control information and clinics to impoverished southern African-Americans. Moreover, the Planned Parenthood founder unequivocally preached a creed of “race improvement,” which meant refining the gene pool and controlling and limiting the reproduction of human beings whom she thought weakened the human race. She clearly saw “Negroes” as among those members of the human race whose reproduction she wanted to control. And there is no doubt that the KKK, being absolute racists, would have lauded that.”

Not only did Sanger seek to control the population growth of Black families, President Johnson’s War on Poverty during the 60’s targeted Black families for government dependency and birth control. Taxpayer funded Planned Parenthood clinics were located in predominately Black neighborhoods to target Black women seeking contraception or abortions. More American unborn Black babies are slaughtered in abortions than any other race. This is genocide.

Add to that, taxpayer funded public schools that indoctrinate generations of Black children through so-called Comprehensive Sex Ed. These sex programs promote early sexual activity, which sustains the Planned Parenthood business model through birth control, teen pregnancies, STD treatments, and abortions. Poor inner city Black youth have been used in “research projects” to develop many of the Comprehensive Sex Ed programs used in public schools across the nation. Such Sexual Rights programs are then funded by federal and state taxes to not only promote birth control and abortion, but also pornographic sex play, gender diversity and transgender agendas.

The ‘newest’ idea from Progressive think tanks is public boarding schools, where inner city youth in Washington, DC are housed during the week and indoctrinated. Once again, our taxes pay for this.

We are all being played by governmental systems and a complicit media. Government and money are the problem, not the solution.

Regardless of whose fault the violence and injustice belongs, the Black family needs help. Senator Tim Scott (SC), one of only two Black US Senators stated today, “The government cannot make us get along,” he said. Instead, Americans would have to do better, be kinder and listen with “their heads and their hearts.”

Black Lives Matter” is an urgent cry to pay attention. Stop defending Whiteness. If you are really not a racist, speak out for justice and stop the madness wherever you live.