Opt Out of Making A Difference!

Featured

Mary S. McLellan, MS, SRAS      ~      Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist

Is your child taking Making A Difference! this year in sex ed? Do you know that Making A Difference! still claims to be an abstinence education program? It isn’t and never has been. Making A Difference! is just another sexually explicit Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) program. It grooms children (12-14 years, Middle School) to engage in sexual activity. Parents need to OPT OUT!

Making A Difference! redefines abstinence to mean “choosing not to do any sexual behavior that could cause pregnancy or spread diseases.” It also claims to not teach any information on condoms or other forms of birth control. That’s not true. An analysis of its the content reveals that it contains plenty of available demonstrations on condoms, birth control/contraception, and dental dams. Plus, every kind of sexual behavior imaginable is describe and promoted as so-called ‘safe-sex.’

Using the “The CSE Harmful Elements Analysis Tool,” developed by Family Watch International, a team analyzed each page of the curriculum, facilitator guide, and student workbook. This tool includes 15 Harmful Elements typically found in CSE and proven to cause harm to children. Making A Difference! scored 15 out of all 15 harmful elements. This sex program should be banned in all fifty states!

The Making A Difference! curriculum and anyone who teaches it grooms children to engage in sexual activity that can have life-long negative consequences.

Making A Difference! is neither age appropriate nor medically accurate. It uses roleplay and sexual scenarios to desensitize and normalize child sex. It teaches minors how to consent to sex as long as condoms are used, convincing them that condoms can make sex safe. Children are taught to decide for themselves when they are “ready to engage in safe, consensual sexual activity.” Educators are trained to ask children as young as 12 years old probing questions like:

Why do you think some young people your age are having sex? What other words do we use for touching? What kind of sex can people have by themselves? What other things might people do with their mouths? What kinds of things can people do with their hands?”

Afterwards, children are introduced to various ways to “express their sexual feelings to themselves and other people.” Such as “talking, hugging, holding hands, kissing, touching, saying ‘I like you,’ dancing, massage, masturbation, caressing, cuddling, grinding, sexual fantasy, touching each other’s genitals, oral sex, vaginal sex, anal sex.” Each of these behaviors are defined in graphic detail just to make sure students know how to do them. Other terms such as homosexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual or straight are explained in graphic detail. Any activity that is” sexually pleasurable” and promotes “sexual orgasm” is acceptable as long as it does “not lead to pregnancy or transmission of disease.” However, we know that in many cases it does lead to pregnancy and disease.

Making A Difference! exploits minors, as well as the educators who are mandated to teach it, because it claims to be evidence-based. This means that it has supposedly been proven successful at encouraging abstinence. Making A Difference! was ‘evaluated’ by its authors and the publisher, ETR Associates, is a former publishing arm of Planned Parenthood. Red Flags! This single evaluation was conducted in 1998 on a small sample of students. This is absurd research design!

The outcomes on Making A Difference! revealed that virgin students abstained for only 3 months after the program. No results were reported for sexually experienced students. That is not success! Why have there not been replication studies conducted on this program in the past 21 years? The only relevant changes to the 5th Edition were to make it more inclusive and sensitive towards LGBTQ youth.

Most parents when told that their 12 year old child will receive abstinence education do not expect them to be instructed on oral, anal and vaginal sex. Most parents that we know would be livid if their child were told that any kind of sex – with anyone – at any age – is appropriate and expected. Using trusted authority figures like educators to teach such sensitive information is deceitful.

Protect your child from sexual exploitation! Making A Difference! is not an abstinence education program as it purports to be. Check out the links in this article before you allow your child into this sex class. Be sure to OPT OUT while you still can. Share this info with other parents. Opting Out sends a message to your school administrators that this type of education is not appropriate for children.

The Protect Child Health Coalition (PCHC), a project of Family Watch International, is a national coalition of parents and professionals. PCHC exists to provide you with the information, tools and resources you need to protect your children.

Opt Out of Reducing the Risk!

Featured

Mary S. McLellan, MS, SRAS      ~      Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist

Will your child take Reducing the Risk this year in sex education? Parents, beware of this Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) program. Reducing the Risk claims to protect students, but it grooms them to engage in risky sexual activity!

Reducing the Risk says that it’s an abstinence-based program, but it redefines abstinence to mean “choosing not to do any sexual activity that carries a risk for pregnancy or STD/HIV.” This completely made-up definition for abstinence means that as long as condoms and/or contraception are used and fluids are not exchanged, any type of sexual activity is acceptable and considered ‘safe!’

Family Watch International has developed “The CSE Harmful Elements Analysis Tool,” which includes 15 Harmful Elements typically found in CSE. Each program analyzed is scored based on actual harmful content from the curriculum, including workbooks, videos, and facilitator materials. So, what about Reducing the Risk?

Reducing the Risk (5th Edition) contains 15/15 of the harmful elements typically found in CSE curricula or materials. Reducing the Risk, and therefore anyone who teaches it, grooms children to engage in sexual activity that can have life-long consequences.

Reducing the Risk not only normalizes child sex, it teaches them how to consent to sex through role plays. Anal, oral and vaginal sex are promoted as long as condoms are used. Homosexual/bisexual behaviors and the child’s right to experience sexual pleasure are all a part of Reducing the Risk. Explicit details about orgasm for both boys and girls are described. Students are taught that even mutual masturbation is a harmless activity for children to engage.

Reducing the Risk goes far beyond condom demonstrations to teach students how to make using condoms fun, exciting, and romantic. The goal of Reducing the Risk is to avoid unprotected sex and DON’T GET PREGNANT! As long as a condom is used and fluids are not exchanged any type of sex at any age is acceptable. Also, students are assigned to “locate clinics” and to learn about their services, condoms, and other forms of contraception to “decide which method(s) might be best for them.”

Throughout Reducing the Risk, students are not given the option to return to an abstinent lifestyle, but simply to “avoid unprotected sex.” Teachers are also trained to be inclusive, to affirm transgender ideology and sexual orientation through role plays and group discussions. Anything goes!

Not surprising, Reducing the Risk undermines parental rights by denigrating traditional values. The program encourages students to decide for themselves when they are ready for sex. Children are told that they do not need their parent’s permission to get contraception or to be tested for STDs/HIV. They’re encouraged to take their boyfriends or girlfriends with them to family planning clinics. Parents are completely irrelevant!

Maybe this kind of content doesn’t bother you. But, don’t you think federally funded CSE programs should at least be proven effective at protecting your child’s sexual health? Reducing the Risk fails to protect students from life-long consequences of sexual activity.

Research findings released in 2018 on Reducing the Risk revealed that while students learned a lot about sex, that knowledge did not translate into reducing sexual activity, reducing sexual intercourse without protection, and it did not reduce pregnancies. “The program had no effects on refusal skills or intentions for future sexual behavior at either time point.”  Yet, Reducing the Risk is still funded with your tax dollars and taught in half of U.S. states!

Parents, OPT OUT of Reducing the Risk while you still can! California has already mandated that parents cannot OPT OUT their students. They must take CSE programs like Reducing the Risk regardless of content or effectiveness.

Your child deserves better sexual health education than Reducing the Risk! Demand it!

The Protect Child Health Coalition (PCHC), a project of Family Watch International, is  a national coalition of parents and professionals. PCHC exists to provide you with the information, tools and resources you need to protect your children.

CDC Data Supports Teen Abstinence!

Mary S. McLellan, MS, SRAS ~ Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist

66511153-Teens-Stay-Healthy-705x522The CDC’s 2018 YRBS (Youth Risk Behavior Survey) Report is out and the data strongly supports students abstaining from all sexual risks.

It also shows that high school students who abstain from all sexual contact (this means oral, anal, and vaginal sex) are healthier than sexually active teens.

 

WOW! Did you hear any of this in the news?

 

Not only has the rate of teen sexual activity continued to decrease in the U.S., students who abstain from sex are also more likely to abstain from other risk behaviors leading to violence, suicide, tobacco use, alcohol and other drugs. Plus, they have better nutritional habits than sexually active teens, which protects them from life-long consequences of obesity.

 

“Students who had no sexual contact have a much lower prevalence of most health-risk behaviors compared with students who had sexual contact with only the opposite sex and students who had sexual contact with only the same sex or with both sexes. For example, the prevalence of all five injury related risk behaviors, all 13 violence-related risk behaviors, all five suicide-related risk behaviors, all 19 tobacco use-related risk behaviors, all 19 risk behaviors related to alcohol and other drug use, and six of the 11 dietary risk behaviors was higher among students who had sexual contact with only the opposite sex and students who had sexual contact with only the same sex or with both sexes than students who had no sexual contact.”(Pg. 108)

 

This amazing news was NOT reported by the main stream media because it doesn’t fit the Sexual Rights narrative. Rather, SIECUS, a spinoff of Planned Parenthood, reported on  “severe health disparities among lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youth and youth of color.”

 

Of course, there are ‘severe health disparities!’ But, the so-called ‘disparities’ occur between those abstaining and those having sex! It only proves that teaching adolescents and teens that sex is normal, good, and expected is very dangerous to their health. 

 

 

SIECUS, CDC DASH (Division of Adolescent and School Health), and many others are responsible for creating these ‘severe health disparities!’ For more than 30 years, they have colluded to normalize high risk sexual behaviors in public schools and community agencies through harmful CSE and influencing public policy and laws.

 

New research by the Institute for Research and Evaluation reveals that CSE has been a dismal failure at protecting the sexual health of youth. Some CSE programs actually harm children. In addition, many of the CSE programs researched had no impact on condom use, which lines up with the CDC YRBS data showing that condom use among sexually active teens is at an all-time-low. No wonder STDs rates are soaring in almost every state.

 

Smart teens are winning! The majority of teens ARE making wise choices and more parents are getting outraged about the obscene and harmful sex ed in their schools.

 

Join the fight to protect the health and innocence of children!

Take a look at the harmful elements found in Rights, Respect, and Responsibility (3Rs), a popular CSE program that is sweeping the U.S.

“Biggest Serial Child Rapist in History!”

Featured

Mary S. McLellan, MS, SRAS ~ Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist
Dr. Judith Reisman, our hero in the Protect Child Health movement, is THE expert on Alfred Kinsey. Reisman wrote the following OpEd in response to a BBC Radio episode entitled Oh Dr Kinsey Look What You’ve Done to Me. This despicable radio promo of Kinsey’s fraudulent science glorifies his sick obsession with sexually exploiting children and babies. Dr. Reisman says it best, “He [Kinsey] was a completely insane human being, besides being a bi homosexual psychopath and the biggest serial child rapist in history.”

**********

Kinsey’s Tragic Phallic & Cervix Tales

By Judith Reisman

Commentator Ben Shapiro notes “society has embraced the “Hefnerian” ethos of plentiful, variety-seeking sexual activity….Leftists will seek a redistributive solution.”

Like most unwed folks in the 1950s, at age 22, Hefner too was virginal. As a naive college lad, Hefner read Prof. Kinsey’s “data” proving wall to wall ancestral fornication, sanctimonious hidden in multitudes of closets!

Wow!

Kinsey’s “science” showed that America’s puritan anti-sex laws had no real social value, (judges could penalize adulterers, seducers, and rapists could get the death penalty!!!). Believing science proved that he had foolishly lost years of lustful joy, Hefner announced, “I will be Kinsey’s pamphleteer” bringing carnality back to the American male!

Reisman.MMSo, December 1953, Kinsey’s sexual “fake news” spread like wildfire via starlet, Marilyn Monroe, waving from the cover of Playboy–she was nude inside. The sexual revolution had begun with nary a shot fired!

The Sexual Revolution was based on a lie” said the National Review. For over 40 years I studied the “Father of the Sexual Revolution,” (Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, 1948 and Female, 1953) tracing Kinsey’s impact on western sex laws. The British documentary, Kinsey’s Paedophiles  unmasks the rapes of up to 2,034 babies and children the zoologist chillingly viewed as orgasmic “pleasure”.

Two recent studies confirm more tragedy from the Kinsey cult. The April Deccan Chronicle reported on Kinsey’s deceptive “data” on male genitalia.

Kinsey concluded that the average penis size is 6.21 inches in length and 4.85 inches in girth based on his research [leading] to generations of men believing they have small penises when the size of their member was actually average...Wrong information about penis length has led to a body dysmorphia among men over the years. This may also cause suicidal thoughts among men who think they have a small penis despite having one that is average in size.

Were Kinsey’s “data” on the average phallus just an error? That is unlikely since he claimed to validate all sex measures, regularly engaging in sodomy with his subjects. As a closet bi/homosexual, sadomasochistic, pornographically addicted pedophile, Kinsey was by definition a sexual psychopath. He knew the average size. Laura Linney, playing his wife in the film, Kinsey, indicates his largess as beyond a 12” ruler. Liam Neeson, (Kinsey), humbly blushes.

Reisman.KinseyIn the past, marriage usually allowed men to experience sexual competence without comparison. How much does belief in Kinsey’s “size” data impact the phenomena of “incels”. These are celibate men who fear marriage and are unable to copulate with whomever, whenever they wish. Strange.

This recent report claims Kinsey’s size error was due to “all white college students” who misled him. Untrue. Most men were interviewed during WWII when those serving in any capacity were prohibited involvement in his “study.” Thus, 86% of his sample included criminals, homosexuals, 1.400 sex offenders, “feeble minded” etc.,—not your average Joe college.

Clinical psychologist Jordon Peterson says the ultimate Evil/Satan “is arrogance incarnate; spite deceit, and cruel, conscious malevolence, pure hatred of Man, God and Being.” Did Kinsey qualify—he would claim infants 2 or 5 months old could orgasm, if they got “help” from older folks.

                After deforming truth about men and children, what of the ladies?

April 25, Healthline reports, zoologist Kinsey’s “data” in his 1953 Female book, claimed the cervix “is the most completely insensitive part of the female genitalia anatomy.” This lie about the female body, “has been costly in physical, psychological and emotional pain.

Based on Kinsey’s erroneous “proofs” women have undergone loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) from the cervix to remove “abnormal cells” that might become cervical cancer. However, mislabeling LEEP as a harmless and necessary procedure, patients have experienced infections, “an overwhelming numbness” and numerous other complications.

For, these “abnormal cells” may never lead to cervical cancer. “Approximately 0.6 percent of people will be diagnosed with cervical cancer in their lifetime.”  One woman who underwent LEEP said, “It was like something had been removed surgically from my body….I had lost my entire sense of sexual identity and connection to my body…I was numb.”

“After that, sex was always painful,” said another. She also had difficulty simply sitting up.  “It hurt to sit down and it’s still hard to sit for long periods [of time].” “In addition to the physical pain, she was experiencing a loss of creativity. She described feeling as if a part of herself had been completely severed.”

Dr. Irwin Goldstein, MD, explained the “cervix brain connection is severed [during a LEEP], and that results in the inability to transfer critical sensory afferent information from the cervix to the critical brain areas.” This can result in “numbness or anhedonia,” a psychological condition where one cannot find pleasure in things formerly pleasurable.

“The cervix is a sexual organ among other things, and during the LEEP, you chop out a good part of it where all of the nerves are…” Barry Komisaruk, PhD, Rutgers University explained the “cervix receives sensory input from three different pairs of nerves,” — pelvic, hypogastric, and vagus — “and I don’t know of any other organ that does [that].”

A Google search will incorrectly tell you that “the cervix has no nerve endings,” thanks to the misinformed Region of Peel. When I asked Dr. Komisaruk why this information isn’t easily available he said, “That’s a long and sad story. The myth that the cervix does not have any sensation originated from the 1953 Kinsey Report.”

 “Sexual Behavior in the Human Female sparked a sexual revolution and brought Alfred Kinsey to fame as a pioneer in human sexuality. But all of this aside, the study inaccurately concluded that the cervix, ‘is the most completely insensitive part of the female genitalia anatomy.’”

Dr. Komisaruk continued,

“The researchers even contradict themselves with this conclusion because their study points to an opposite outcome. Numbers ranging as high as 84 percent of patients responded to an object that was larger than a probe when put in contact with the cervix. “It got into the literature,” said Dr. Komisaruk. “Ask any woman who has had a Pap smear. Obviously, they feel it. This myth has been perpetuated by the Kinsey Report.”

These malevolent data are indicative of Kinsey’s, a bi/homosexual, clear contempt for women. His “research” was always ideologically driven by identity politics. Once marriage and the production of children established the lie of Mr. and Mrs. Kinsey as a normal married couple, the professor abandoned his wife’s bed for sadomasochistic sodomy, and pornographic filming with a cast of handsome young men.

How was Kinsey funded by the elite Rockefeller Foundation, revered as a scientist, regularly quoted worldwide, responsible for changing the Model Penal Code, etc., etc., while claiming infants 2 months old could orgasm if “helped” from older folks?

The Kinsey Institute thrives, with SIECUS, Planned Parenthood and their UNESCO spinoffs standing on child rapist “data,” phony penis size “data,” phony cervix “data”, etc., as global experts! When will we investigate and condemn the Kinsey Institute and halt their “educational” spread via their powerful role now representing the United Nations to the globe?

Mary E. McAlister, Esq., also contributed to this commentary.

Posted with permission

Take a Stand! Join the Sex Ed Sit Out!

Featured

Sharing info from David Cooke and Citizen Go.

Hands off our kids!

Don’t Sexualize Our Kids!

We, as concerned parents and community members, are sick of the sexualization of our children! We say NO to graphic, gender-bending, promiscuity-promoting sex education for our kids.

We demand that public schools stop treating our children like guinea pigs in some social engineering experiment. We demand that schools respect parents’ values and parents’ authority.

We will not stand for our tax money being used to promote sexual liberation, deviance, and gender confusion to our precious kids. In protest, we stand together with those parents pulling their children out of public school on April 23rd for the sex ed sit out.

SIGN NOW

Dear Mary,

In less than one week, the “Sex Ed Sit Out”will take place in cities across the US, Canada, and Australia.

Parents are fed up with the sexual education (indoctrination) their children are receiving in our public school system. They want their kids to learn the three Rs, not the LGBTQIAs. They are tired of their hard-earned tax dollars going to pay for programs and policies that blatantly contradict their family’s values and beliefs.

That’s why parents will be pulling their kids out of public schools across the globe onMonday, April 23rd, 2018. They are protesting graphic, gender-bending, promiscuity-promoting sex education for our kids.

Show your support and sign the petition: http://www.citizengo.org/en/fm/160082-fed-parents-plan-sex-ed-sit-out

This protest was initiated by a group of moms on social media. These are moms who love and care for their kids. They want them to learn respect, decency, and virtue. They do not think they should be learning how to have anal and oral sex, masturbate one another, or change genders. These are just some of the perverse practices being promoted in so-called “comprehensive sexuality education” (CSE).

I fought hard against CSE at the United Nations last month, along with a team of international CitizenGO campaigners. UN-based CSE programs encourage immoral behaviour and dangerous experimentation while downplaying abstinence and omitting purity. I am so encouraged to see this grassroots “Sex Ed Sit Out” effort growing and expanding to address CSE on the local level – where our kids are most impacted.

Elizabeth Johnston (“Activist Mommy“), one of the founding moms, is quoted in Newsweek as saying, “This is a sit out everyone can support and that we should be supporting. If you are not a rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth leftist liberal who wants to pervert the minds of children, everyone should be able to support [it].”

Sign now: http://www.citizengo.org/en/fm/160082-fed-parents-plan-sex-ed-sit-out

To date, official protests are planned for twelve cities:

  • Austin, Texas
  • Bloomington, Indiana
  • Charlotte, North Carolina
  • Decorah, Iowa
  • Garden Grove, California
  • Martinsburg, West Virginia
  • Sacramento, California
  • San Antonio, Texas
  • Spokane, Washington
  • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
  • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia

More details area available on the Sex Ed Sit Out web site and Facebook page.

Whether you are a parent or not, please join us by signing our petition to say NOto graphic, immoral sex education for children! And if you are able to come out in person, join the “Sex Ed Sit Out” protest next Monday, April 23rd at one of the locations above – or start a protest in your own town.

Sincerely Yours,

David Cooke and the entire CitizenGO Team

Sign and share the petition: http://www.citizengo.org/en/fm/160082-fed-parents-plan-sex-ed-sit-out

P.S. Our children are our future. We all need to be concerned about who’s filling their minds with what. Please sign and share the petition today to help make our voices heard. God Bless.

FRUSTRATED PARENTS TURN TO GRASSROOTS SEX ED SIT OUT

Featured

CHARLOTTE, NC – APRIL 23, 2018 – PRESS RELEASE –

A grassroots movement of frustrated public school parents who want to end the sexualization of their children during class time has turned their frustration to action with a “Sex Ed Sit Out” protest on April 23rd.

The protest, launched by a few moms on social media who were troubled by the graphic nature of current sex education resources in schools, has grown into a global movement with protests being held in multiple U.S. cities and also Australia and the UK.

Parents are demanding to know why their children are being taught how to have anal and oral sex, masturbate one another, and question one’s gender. Caryl Ayala, a former public school teacher and organizer of the Austin, Texas, protest, said, “We are uniting with parents across the globe to demand that our rights as parents be respected regarding the teaching of sexuality and sexual orientation. Hands off our kids!”

Cities such as Rocklin, CA and Fairfax County, VA have recently been the focus of news headlines because of controversial, gender-bending and graphic sex education and anti-bullying programs which parents say they were not informed would be taught to their children, sometimes as young as five-years-old. “

“Why are our tax dollars going to pay for curriculums and resources that teach dangerous and promiscuous behaviors which most parents find morally abhorrent and the CDC has stated are a health risk?” questioned Elizabeth Johnston, viral activist blogger and concerned mother.

“Furthermore, why aren’t administrators being transparent with parents about the content of sexuality resources? It’s as if they have something to hide. That should frighten parents everywhere.”

Education Chairman of the Indiana Liberty Coalition and one of the protest organizers, Rhonda Miller, stated,

“Follow the money. Comprehensive sex ed is being rolled out across America, often sponsored by special interest LGBT groups like Human Rights Campaign, and disguised as anti-bullying programs. If it’s not okay for special interest groups like the NRA to be buying classroom time to push their agenda, then how is it okay for HRC monies to be buying schools off to teach gender-bending ideology and anal sex tutorials?”

On April 23rd, parents around the nation will be pulling their children out of school for the day in protest of dangerous and graphic sex education and uniting at various locations to hold press events and field media questions.

For more information about the Sex Ed Sit Out in your area, visit www.SexEdSitOut.com or contact:

Elizabeth Johnston

ActivistMommyOfficial@gmail.com

(740) 973-0542

Girls are set up to fail…

Why are young girls so vulnerable to sex traffickers? Are they groomed in sex classes to expect and readily accept sexual advances? 

LifeSite News published this tragic story last week: 


14-Year-Old Sex Trafficking Victim Was Forced to Have Sex Thousands of Times 

Typical Comprehensive Sexuality Education programs normalize adolescent and teen sex to the point that many kids, who do not want to engage in sexual behaviors, are ostracized. In fact, parents are often unwilling to opt-out their children from sex classes due to peer pressure from other parents and school administrators. 

Until we get to the root causes of this vulnerability, our kids are set up to fail. Every parent and taxpayer needs to research Alfred Kinsey’s fraudulent sex experiments on babies and the harms of pornography. Then, review the sex curricula in your local school district, including videos, handouts, workbooks, and brochures to see if there are any similarities to Kinsey’s “research” and pornography. 
Don’t ever take the teacher’s word that the lessons are age appropriate. You know and love your child more than anyone else. 
It is very difficult for kids, who’s brains will not fully mature until ~ age 25, to distinguish right from wrong when an authority figure is teaching. They are told to trust and believe the teacher. 
It is your job, parents and all adults, to protect the health and innocence of children, not to exploit them.