Cosmo writer: Men pushed reluctant women’s movement to demand legal abortion

Saynsumthn's Blog

Author Sue Ellen Browder once aligned with 1960’s pro-abortion feminism. As a former writer for Cosmopolitan Magazine, she was also complicit in promoting the sexual revolution, which she now believes reduced women to ambitious sex objects. After years of research, Browder concluded that her thinking was being manipulated by a propaganda machine which would unite two movements — the feminist movement and the sexual revolution — to push abortion. She compiled her findings in the captivating book, “Subverted: How I Helped the Sexual Revolution Hijack the Women’s Movement.”

Browder, who was trained as investigative journalist at the University of Missouri School of Journalism, spoke in an interview with Live Action founder Lila Rose:

“People don’t remember how bad it was for women”

“In 1963, that was the relaunch of the women’s movement in the 20

View original post 798 more words

Big Decisions 2016

Excellent info about a horrible Comprehensive Sexuality Education Curricula. Parents beware!

Take Back the SHAC

The differences between Big Decisions 2016 and the previous version can be subtle in some areas.  But with close analysis, we see big steps towards the gender fluidity messages for young people.

For example, there is a discussion on anatomy.  Here is the introduction for the teacher to give –

anatomy slides instructions

Then the slides are labeled Reproductive System, Outside and Inside without references to Male and Female.

Teachers are told –

“It is important to maintain a safe, respectful, and inclusive learning environment for all students, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and students who are questioning or unsure of their orientation or gender… not all students who identify as males have a penis and testicles. Likewise, not all who identify as female have a vagina and a uterus.”

An analysis of Big Decisions shows that this Comprehensive Sex Education program contains 15 of the Harmful Elements of CSE.

https://www.comprehensivesexualityeducation.org/wp-content/uploads/15-Harmful-Elements_Big-Decisions-v2016_final-1-1.pdf

anatomy - outside 1anatomy - inside 1anatomy - outside 2anatomy - inside 2

View original post

Is Abortion industry push for more Black/ minority abortions reminiscent of eugenics?

Saynsumthn's Blog

Abortion industry pushes for more minority abortions in TV and movies

pregnant, abortion, Black

Going hand in hand with Planned Parenthood’s announcement that abortion would be its number one focus in 2019 come plans to promote abortion as normal in movies and TV. This effort to change the so-called “stigma” that surrounds abortion by “working with content creators on honest and authentic portrayals of abortion in film and television” will include creating more portrayals of “women of color (WOC)” obtaining abortions — something that should raise the eyebrows of anyone who knows about the eugenic history of Planned Parenthood.

The move comes as women of color are experiencing declining abortion rates.

Planned Parenthood’s former “special affiliate,” the Guttmacher Institute, found that “Black women had the highest abortion rate in 2014 (27.1 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age) and white women had the lowest…

View original post 839 more words

Planned Parenthood staffers: toxic work environment, pregnancy discrimination, intimidation, prioritizes profit over care

Saynsumthn's Blog

As employees speak out, Planned Parenthood’s mask begins to crack

mask, Planned Parenthood

A new phenomenon appears to be taking place at Planned Parenthood. In what was a shock to many, in 2018, political activist president Cecile Richards suddenly announced her resignation, followed by that of VP Dawn Laguens and VP of Communications, Kevin Griffis, among others. Planned Parenthood hired ER doctor Leana Wen — who has called abortion “health care” — to replace Richards, and vowed that abortion will be its focus in 2019. But at the same time, employees of the so-called “women’s rights organization” are spilling long-held secrets and exposing inner workings and toxic attitudes of the organization, founded 100 years ago by eugenicist Margaret Sanger. While these revelations might come as a surprise to pro-choicers, pro-lifers know that the organization’s roots have been rotten since its inception.

Lower level staffers revolt against Planned…

View original post 822 more words

SC Heartbeat Bill Saves More Lives

Featured

Mary S. McLellan, SRAS ~ Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist

Robert Swain, MS-HIA

newborn-baby-feet-basket-161709Don’t you just love it when “journalist” overwhelm you with data and then promote their own propaganda to support unrestricted abortions? That’s exactly what Lauren Sausser’s recent article (Post and Courier, Charleston, SC) intended to do.

 

Thousands of women leave SC for abortions, also has the subtitle, “Rate of patients who had the procedure same as 20 years ago.” The reader is lead to believe that Pro-Life efforts in South Carolina have failed, that abortion rates have not decreased, that babies have not been saved, and that Pro-Lifers should give it up!

Regardless of how Sausser’s data was cherry picked, we looked at the rates of abortions received by SC residents inside and outside of the state. We compared identical time periods using Guttmacher (Pro-Abortion and the former research arm of Planned Parenthood) and SC DHEC rates:

  • Guttmacher: The 2014 rate is 34% lower than the rate in 1991.
  • SC DHEC: The 2014 rate is 42% lower than in 1991.

Bottom line…Abortions received by SC residents have dramatically decreased regardless of where the abortion took place. To indicate otherwise is just more Fake News.

The real issue Sausser has is that some women must travel to North Carolina (Charlotte) and Georgia to get abortions because South Carolina Pro-Life legislation makes it more difficult for women to have abortions in state. Convenience is the problem.

However, according to the South Carolina Citizens for Life, almost 175,000 babies have been saved thanks to life affirming legislation over the past thirty years!

The real target of the article is the SC Heartbeat Bill which, if successful this time, will prohibit doctors from performing an abortion on any fetus after a heartbeat has been detected. More babies can potentially be saved! A heartbeat is all it would take!

The passage of the SC Heartbeat Bill would also mean that more women will have to travel out of state if they really want to have the abortion. That’s their right.

South Carolina is right to restrict abortions as much as they legally can. We applaud the Heartbeat Bill, Sen. Larry Grooms, and all of his fellow legislators who seek to protect life. Let the blood of the innocents be on those states that do not regard life as sacred.

Ultimately, abortion is not really a ‘choice’ for those seeking help. There are ten times more Pregnancy Care Centers in SC than abortion centers, all of which offer women real choices that they and their babies can live with.

Let’s support the Pregnancy Centers and welcome the mothers and babies they will save.