Genetics determines Gender

Take Back the SHAC

GeneticsdeterminesGenderGenetics determines gender
revealed through genitals
for generating generations.

It is that simple.

The root ‘gen‘ means ‘birth’ or ‘origin’.  Common words with this root include genesis, genetics, eugenics, genealogy, generate, and generic.

Each one of us is born with XX or XYChromosomes.  XXmeans that a person is FemaleXY means that a person is Male.  Throughout one’s development, the XXand XYChromosomes are instructing the body how to develop including each of the Reproductive Systems in the body.  When a baby is born, that gender is revealed to the parents, doctors, and family through the genitals/genitalia of the baby.  In fact, ultrasounds of a baby in utero can often reveal the genitals hence the gender of the baby.  There are examples in…

View original post 418 more words

Girls are set up to fail…

Why are young girls so vulnerable to sex traffickers? Are they groomed in sex classes to expect and readily accept sexual advances? 

LifeSite News published this tragic story last week: 


14-Year-Old Sex Trafficking Victim Was Forced to Have Sex Thousands of Times 

Typical Comprehensive Sexuality Education programs normalize adolescent and teen sex to the point that many kids, who do not want to engage in sexual behaviors, are ostracized. In fact, parents are often unwilling to opt-out their children from sex classes due to peer pressure from other parents and school administrators. 

Until we get to the root causes of this vulnerability, our kids are set up to fail. Every parent and taxpayer needs to research Alfred Kinsey’s fraudulent sex experiments on babies and the harms of pornography. Then, review the sex curricula in your local school district, including videos, handouts, workbooks, and brochures to see if there are any similarities to Kinsey’s “research” and pornography. 
Don’t ever take the teacher’s word that the lessons are age appropriate. You know and love your child more than anyone else. 
It is very difficult for kids, who’s brains will not fully mature until ~ age 25, to distinguish right from wrong when an authority figure is teaching. They are told to trust and believe the teacher. 
It is your job, parents and all adults, to protect the health and innocence of children, not to exploit them. 

The foundation that just gave Planned Parenthood an award also funded its eugenics projects

Saynsumthn's Blog

Since 1945, the Lasker Awards have been granted by the Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation to recognize “the contributions of scientists, physicians, and public servants who have made major advances in the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of human disease.” In a previous Live Action News report, Danny David detailed the reasons why the Lasker-Bloomberg Public Service Award to Planned Parenthood was based in anything but science.

But another piece of interesting information is this: Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger’s most infamous “Negro Project,” motivated by her belief in eugenics, was funded in part by none other than Albert Lasker.

In 1939, Sanger penned a letter to Clarence Gamble regarding her desire to use Black ministers in furthering her organization’s agenda, because, she said, “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” and if…

View original post 853 more words

Planned Parenthood not serious about disavowing racist history

Saynsumthn's Blog

Planned Parenthood and its marketing gurus want you to believe that they have disavowed founder Margaret Sanger for her racist beliefs despite Sanger’s name being prominently linked to its facilities and while continuing to praise her online. The fact is that Planned Parenthood often refers to Margaret Sanger as a “hero” and continues to make light of her racist history as well as her associations with the Ku Klux Klan.

As Live Action News has previously detailed, Margaret Sanger was a proponent of eugenics who spoke to the women’s branch of KKK in 1926. She also created the “Negro Project” where she schemed in her letter penned to Clarence Gamble, to use Black ministers because, she said, “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” and if it did, these ministers…

View original post 1,368 more words

Did Hillary Clinton’s lauding of abortion contribute to ‘what happened’ to her failed presidential bid?

Saynsumthn's Blog

The media is all abuzz over Hillary Clinton’s new book, “What Happened ” — a book certain pundits believe is nothing more than a long list of excuses and blame shifting for Clinton’s failed run for the presidency in 2016. And while there are many reasons why Clinton lost her 2016 presidential bid, one of those was likely her radical stand on abortion and support for Planned Parenthood. After all, Clinton hired campaign staff associated with Planned Parenthood, and was endorsed and funded by the abortion corporation.

What Happened? by Hillary Clinton

Screenshot via NBC video

While Clinton is to blame for her own positions on “issues” like abortion, certainly she also has the Democratic Party to thank, after the group bragged about making its 2016 platform the most pro-abortion platform in history. As Live Action…

View original post 947 more words

Consider the $ource!

Featured

Mary S. McLellan, MS, SRAS ~ Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist

Sexperts continue to spout ideology rather than medically accurate facts and age appropriate information. They scare parents, teachers, and even faith leaders into believing that every child, adolescent, and teen is going to have sex and that there’s nothing they can do about it.

 

All, while the CDC reports dramatic decreases in sexually active teens! If Sexperts really believed that teaching kids to abstain is futile:

  • Why sneak their sex programs into school districts under the guise of abstinence education?
  • Why claim to teach abstinence when they clearly don’t know how to do it?
  • Why grab government funding that is only meant for teaching kids the skills NOT TO HAVE SEX, and use it to normalize sexual activity?
  • Why be so deceitful about the content of Comprehensive Sex Ed programs if they are really so much better for kids?

John Santelli, Planned Parenthood’s golden-boy, and Leslie Kantor, VP of Education at Planned Parenthood Federation of America, are prolific “researchers” on the abstinence or Sexual Risk Avoidance (SRA) approach to public health. They even claim to have no conflict of interest when reporting about the so-called failures of abstinence education.

Who are they kidding?  Sexualizing innocent children, encouraging minors to explore their sexuality, dispensing contraception, and then treating STDs and aborting babies is their bread-and-butter! It’s all about the money!

Santelli and Kantor’s most recent hit-piece, Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage: An Updated Review of U.S. Policies, denigrates programs that seek to protect the health and innocence of minors. Their article is basically a rehash of one published in 2006. Other contributors include other Sexual Rights Activists from the Guttmacher Institute, Columbia University, Planned Parenthood, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, and Indiana University – home of the Kinsey Institute! They are all known antagonists to abstinence or SRA education.

Among many assertions, the authors contend that there is a fundamental right to be taught everything there is to know about human sexuality and sexual pleasure. They complain that: “The US federal approach to abstinence promotion raises serious ethical and human rights concerns. Access to complete and accurate STI, HIV/AIDS, and reproductive and sexual health information has been recognized as a basic human right and essential to realizing the human right to the highest attainable standard of health.”

Really? For minors?

And, who is it that recognizes “reproductive and sexual health information” is a “basic human right?”  Sexual Rights Activists, of course, and especially those operating through the United Nations. However, none of their so-called “human rights” are binding on US public health policies or US parental rights.

These so called “rights” are completely fabricated to promote the Sexual Rights agenda. Family Watch International has fought the Sexual Rights Agenda at the United Nations for decades. Family Watch supports the family and parental rights to protect their children from sexual exploitation. To find out more, watch The War on Children: The Comprehensive Sexuality Education Agenda.

We believe that minor children, including teens, have the legal and human right to be protected from anyone that would harm them physically, emotionally, or psychologically. Therefore, it is beyond obscene to expose them to sexually explicit information.

Who are these “researchers?” They are depraved activist who seek every opportunity to sexually exploit innocent children for their own financial gain.