She is touted as a “medical professor,” but apparently had plans other than to behave professionally. She violated school rules and live-tweeted her personal opinions about the content which have now gone viral.
Who did she tweet to? Who retweeted her tweets to make them go viral??
Following is an open letter to this mother:
Dear “Live-Tweet Mom,”
It is obvious that you had an agenda other than “concerned mother” when you visited your child’s sex ed class on abstinence day. What did you expect? I feel sad for your child, your partner, and your school district.
It is amazing that the “A” word was even used in a sex ed course! Abstinence is seldom used in Planned Parenthood/SIECUS type sex programs. When the term abstinence is used, it is usually redefined as “avoiding unprotected sex” and then this “new, progressive” definition is repeated a thousand times throughout the course to indoctrinate generations.
No one can verify the facts of this class, not even you. You weren’t there to listen. It was only one day. This is not an abstinence-only course, but an abstinence-only day.
You just outed the Sexual Rights Agenda that is so famous for saying that they do teach abstinence, but they want so-called “safe sex” taught, also. Really?
If an Abstinence Advocate sat in on a Planned Parenthood/SIECUS type sex class such as Making Proud Choices! or Be Proud! Be Responsible! and live-tweeted, do you think it would make national news and go viral?
Of course not!
No one would ever know about the sexual foreplay instructions for 11-13 year-olds showing them how to have “fun,” ”pleasurable,” “erotic,” oral, anal, and vaginal sex with condoms and extra lube. Is this age appropriate?
The Sexual Rights Network would continue to squash all media attempts to report medically accurate information that STDs such as HPV, Herpes, and Syphilis can be spread skin-to-skin, outside the protection of a condom. Holes in condoms are not required!
And, parents would never know that their daughters are trained to pleasure boys and help them regain erections. (Making Proud Choices! for middle schools.)
There would be no media outcry requiring that public schools stop teaching children how to have sex, which is not just a physical act, but involves the emotions and development of the adolescent brain. There would be no calls to protect our children’s brains from the pornography and “hands-on” skills taught in many sex classes today.
Teachers might still be fired or prosecuted for sexual liaisons with our children, but there would be no efforts to actually prevent the grooming of children and teens in our public schools, which sets them up for pregnancies, abortions, exploitation, human sex trafficking, prostitution, and the porn/sex industries.
The media blackout would enable Planned Parenthood, SIECUS, Kinsey Institute, and Advocates for Youth to continue their infrastructure building throughout all taxpayer institutions and the implementation of the National Sexuality Education Standards.
No. If a parent biased towards abstinence education were to live-tweet the pornographic content of today’s sex classes, nothing would happen.
What if schools had cameras in each sex class to provide live feeds and/or send the recordings to parents and taxpayers? Full disclosure and transparency!
Maybe then, parents – who have never known a day without sexual “freedom,” abortions, contraception, STDs, and chaotic family relationships – will also learn what is being taught to their child.
Maybe then, parents would realize that today’s sex ed is not about them. It is about their child’s future health, as well as their grandchildren’s likelihood of growing up in a home with their own parents who are emotionally and mentally capable of providing a safe and stable family environment for them.
This was obviously a setup and you received your moment of fame and fortune, but will your child? What about the other children in this school district?
What messages are they receiving from this fiasco?